Thank you Matt. I'm glad that, for once, it wasn't the result of my failure to
set something up!
Regards,
Tim
(Apologies for whatever format this message comes in... I'm using the google
mobile groups app)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket U
Thank you Matt. I'm glad that, for once, it wasn't the result of my failure to
set something up!
Regards,
Tim
(Apologies for whatever format this message comes in... I'm using the google
mobile groups app)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket U
Thank you Matt. I'm glad that, for once, it wasn't the result of my failure to
set something up!
Regards,
Tim
(Apologies for whatever format this message comes in... I'm using the google
mobile groups app)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket U
> My lazy-sequence implementation was exactly following SICP: while
> theoretically pure and good, might not be the best in practice, so I believe
> your implementation can be much better.
>
> Major performance boost in stateful implementation compared to lazy-sequence
> with delay and force co
BTW, expanding to full screen,does not immediately do what I want.
Reducing far enough the zoom factor of the browser automatically places the
margin notes in the margin.
Of course a full screen allows larger zoom factors than delimited screens.
Very nice.
Thanks, Jos
_
From: Jos Koot [
I've pushed a repair for `text-outline` in the "draw-lib" package.
The implementation of `text-outline` used a small bitmap to accumulate
the path, and Cairo apparently discards paths that are far enough
outside the bitmap's region. The revised implementation uses a
recording surface, instead, to
Hi John,
On 5/29/2015 12:44 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote:
> On May 28, 2015, at 1:53 PM, George Neuner wrote:
> I did see the message from John Clements. I'm not a Racket developer,
> but superficially it appears to me that the negative delay values John
> found should be causi
I don't see any relevant calls to that function, either, which suggests
that the problem is in the "something terrible is happening" category.
Some bugs have been fixed in Racket since v6.1.1. It's not at all clear
that those bugs are relevant, but if it's easy to check, does buidling
a current sn
Thanks, I'm studying units, at this time they do not seems to be particularly
helpful to entangle this mess (seems like more work, not less), but I need to
deepen my understanding... Other suggestions will be appreciated as well, in
the meantime!
> If the issue you're facing is mutual depend
> On May 28, 2015, at 1:53 PM, George Neuner wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 May 2015 08:34:11 -0700 (PDT), N N
> wrote:
>
>> I've been trying to set up Racket for evaluation purposes and due to being
>> on CentOS with no root privileges, I've chosen the Racket minimal
>> distribution.
>>
>> I was ab
Folks,
I have a pull request pending to break net/url into:
- net/url: which functions as it currently does
- net/url-strings: to parse/unparse URL strings and paths
Here is my justification for doing so:
I am writing some software that requires net/url to parse URLs to
find their host, path an
Alexis King writes:
> > How does this compare to https://github.com/ijp/pfds/ or the work
> > described in http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/sfp10-kth.pdf ?
>
> In the case of the former, that targets R6RS, while this is
> intended to be a more “native” Racket solution. The latter is in
>
Thanks to Metthew Burrerick and Gereg Henderschott for your replies.
Deleting the css files works.
I think best for me is to get accustomed to the new format.
I think uniformness of format of docs is important,
especially when putting things available for others.
Thanks again, Jos
_
From:
I see. I suppose that on the second call to "$ drracket -singleInstance",
it's main.rkt that is visited again? I'd be surprised if singleInstance
discarded all the flags though.
Instead of flags though, one could write something like @12,15 to
specify the line and column, so that the OS thinks it'
Ah: with the command line the initial time I think it can be made to work.
I was worried about the communication of positions later on.
Robby
On Friday, May 29, 2015, Laurent wrote:
> I was optimistic this could work because when you launch DrRacket with bad
> flags it tries to open files with
My lazy-sequence implementation was exactly following SICP: while
theoretically pure and good, might not be the best in practice, so I
believe your implementation can be much better.
Major performance boost in stateful implementation compared to
lazy-sequence with delay and force comes from removi
> Hi, the full code is attached (I hope Google Groups will preserve it...).
Thank you for this! There is absolutely a performance gap, and I'll definitely
look over it and see if I can figure out exactly why (I think a well-built
sequence-based model should have comparable speed). I did implemen
> How does this compare to https://github.com/ijp/pfds/ or the work described
> in http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/sfp10-kth.pdf ?
In the case of the former, that targets R6RS, while this is intended to be a
more “native” Racket solution. The latter is in Typed Racket, while this is
currentl
Hi, the full code is attached (I hope Google Groups will preserve it...).
Best regards,
Alexey
On 29 May 2015 at 11:51, Alexis King wrote:
> > Maybe this belongs a bit more to your previous thread, but it can also
> relate here:
> > I see you are making generic sequence interface to collection
> Maybe this belongs a bit more to your previous thread, but it can also relate
> here:
> I see you are making generic sequence interface to collections. Clojure from
> 1.7 seems to move more towards "reducebles" rather than "sequable". I have
> played with this idea for Racket a bit and it seem
I was optimistic this could work because when you launch DrRacket with bad
flags it tries to open files with these names, at least on Ubuntu:
$ drracket my-file.rkt --line
will try to open the file "--line" and complain with a GUI message. So I
guess that means the non recognized flags are sent to
On 28/05/2015 09:59, Alexis King wrote:
As a followup to my last thread regarding my generic collections library, I
have now created a package that uses it to define an entirely new data
structure. I've implemented Clojure's 32-way bitmapped tries to create a
persistent vector implementation.
It looks great! Thanks for putting time and effort into this.
I think Racket in general will benefit from better support of immutable
collections: it has already made the departure from Scheme by making cons-cells
immutable. So, this is next logical step.
Maybe this belongs a bit more to your p
23 matches
Mail list logo
