Thanks! I've pushed repairs for these problems, mreged recent changes
from the main development branches, and updated the snapshot here:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~mflatt/tmp/scope-snapshot/
At Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:56:04 -0400, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
Another weird error:
#lang racket/base
Hi all,
Common Lisp has a very useful idiom of SETF that can set values to arbitrary
places. For example, one can set (1 2)-th item of an array A as:
(SETF (AREF A 1 2) 20.0d0)
Scheme preferred way is to use `*-set!` procedures. However, sometimes it is
inconvenient. For example, if I want to
windows 7; it's most obvious in
preferences - warnings
also choose language - details
I can ivoke and reverse it from this screen:
Control Panel\Appearance and Personalization\Display
- make text and other items larger or smaller
- medium
--
You received this message because you are
Perhaps, I'm wrong, but I don't believe there's an *explicit*
convention; however, as far as I've seen, it typically is used for
function variants (more specifically, I *usually* see it used to
distinguish multiple functions which do more or less the same thing with
different input forms).
Greetings.
On 2015 Jun 29, at 16:05, Philip Blair peblair...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps, I'm wrong, but I don't believe there's an *explicit* convention;
however, as far as I've seen, it typically is used for function variants
(more specifically, I *usually* see it used to distinguish
You're right that there's not a form that's like `except-out` but
constrained both by name and phase. There's also not an export variant
of `only-meta-in`, which would get your half-way there. You could
implement a new provide expander to do that.
Otherwise, in addition to the strategy that you
Is there an explicit strategy for the use of / in function names, overlay/xy,
scale/xy and so on?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Racket Users group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Thanks for your help. I did consider the only-meta-in approach, but then I’d be
excluding the syntax-rules export as well, which I was trying to avoid if
possible.
On Jun 29, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
You're right that there's not a form that's like
Oops, didn't Cc list:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Greg Hendershott
greghendersh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I'll have to update the version number, so there's now a
racket-current-x86_64-linux.sh
installer link.
On Jun 29, 2015, at 5:56 AM, Alexey Cherkaev alexey.cherk...@gmail.com wrote:
For example, I was thinking of defining syntax to access my implementation of
multidimensional arrays
as
(define-syntax aref
(syntax-rules (set!)
[(set! (aref ?a ?i ...) ?v) (array-set! ?a ?i ... ?v)]
10 matches
Mail list logo
