On 2/8/2019 5:25 PM, P. Baillet wrote:
I’ve been playing with |raco distribute| to build small docker images
with racket binaries in them and it seems that the command sometimes
creates a very deep tree and crashes in the end (with Racket 7.2):
On some platforms [those that use AUFS], a
On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 5:16:31 PM UTC+8, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>
>
> Den ons. 6. feb. 2019 kl. 12.33 skrev James Geddes >:
>
>> There was a recent discussion on this list about the Racket guides and
>> manuals. Without wishing to comment on the suggestions therein, I did want
>> to
It looks like the source tree has copies of itself inside it. This part of
the path is repeating:
/racket/pipo/app/lib/plt/tlf/exts/ert/r0/
I use raco distribute regularly on Windows, and while the path tree it
creates is longer than I would like, it is nowhere near as deep, here is
mine
Hello list,
I’ve been playing with `raco distribute` to build small docker images
with racket binaries in them and it seems that the command sometimes
creates a very deep tree and crashes in the end (with Racket 7.2):
```
root@a8ec24e4167d:/racket/pipo# raco distribute app tlf
copy-file:
> On Feb 7, 2019, at 7:32 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> but it might just be easier to just get a professorship instead (also
> nontrivial). :)
Absolutely.
* How many academic PL experts do you know that design languages?
* How many of their languages reach an audience of more than 7?
*
On 2/8/2019 12:30 PM, James Platt wrote:
I noticed recently that there have been several messages to this list which
took an excessively long time to get to me. For example, two messages from
George Neuner, which arrived today, were actually sent on Wednesday. Since I
am having messages
Yes, that's what happened here. I approved the message as soon as I got the
notification but that was well after the message was sent.
Sam
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 9:51 AM Robby Findler There are some messages that get held up in the spam traps that
> requires one of the admins to explicitly
On Feb 8, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> There are some messages that get held up in the spam traps that
> requires one of the admins to explicitly approve (this happens when
> the post comes from someone on the list, but where they post with a
> different email address, I believe).
There are some messages that get held up in the spam traps that
requires one of the admins to explicitly approve (this happens when
the post comes from someone on the list, but where they post with a
different email address, I believe).
I didn't approve these particular ones, tho, so I'm not sure
I noticed recently that there have been several messages to this list which
took an excessively long time to get to me. For example, two messages from
George Neuner, which arrived today, were actually sent on Wednesday. Since I
am having messages delivered to my desktop client, I decided to
On Feb 6, 2019, at 11:28, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2019, at 2:22 PM, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>> Interestingly according to Matt these ideas were already floating around at
>> his uni as early as 98?
> My recollection is that Kent taught with this approach because
Hi all,
Is there an idiom in SXPath/SXSLT for selecting a node and keeping only a small
subset of its children by name?
E.g., if, somewhere in my document, I have
...50 other elements...
...
...more
Matthew Flatt writes:
> Personally, while my contributions to Chez Scheme so far have been
> modest, I have already factored into my costs the worst-case scenario
> of fully maintaining Chez Scheme as used by Racket. Even if that
> happens, it still looks like a good deal in the long run.
That's
> On Feb 6, 2019, at 3:19 PM, George Neuner wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 12:50:21 -0500, Matthias Felleisen
> mailto:matth...@felleisen.org>> wrote:
>
>>> On Feb 6, 2019, at 12:30 PM, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was quite surprised to read these nanopass ideas have
Den ons. 6. feb. 2019 kl. 12.33 skrev James Geddes :
> There was a recent discussion on this list about the Racket guides and
> manuals. Without wishing to comment on the suggestions therein, I did want
> to say what I really, really like about the Racket documentation.
>
> There are two things.
---
C A L L F O R P A P E R S
---
== TFP 2019 ==
20th Symposium on Trends in Functional Programming
12-14 June, 2019
+1
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 18:48, David Storrs wrote:
> For what it's worth, I like having the Guide and the Reference be
> separate things. They have different purposes and trying to mash them
> together is likely to make them worse at both.
>
> The Guide is designed to introduce new concepts,
17 matches
Mail list logo
