Hi all,
Suppose, I have a datum that represents valid racket code, like '(test #:a
a #:b b #: c). I'd love to render (arbitrarily deeply nested) datums like
this to a string that displays like this:
(test
#:a a
#:b b
#:c c)
Pretty printing almost works:
(displayln
(pretty-format
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:04 PM Tom Gillespie wrote:
>
> Are you using emacs racket-mode?
I am, almost exclusively. Exception and check failure locations can be a
pain, but they work in general.
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:41 PM zeRusski wrote:
>>
>> If I have many test chunks spread around my
I am a big fan of having tests alongside code so (module+ test ...) is
magic. The only annoyance I've been running into lately is error reporting.
If I have many test chunks spread around my code and some code change
throws an exception or a contract violation it is impossible to tell which
Call for Papers:
12th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering
(SLE 2019)
co-located with SPLASH 2019
Athens, Greece
October 21-22, 2019
https://conf.researchr.org/home/sle-2019
On 01/04/2019 23:37, Robby Findler wrote:
> Generate multiples of those and combine them (shifting old ones over
> and adding new ones as the lowest digits)?
>
> I'm not sure of a good way to generate nats uniformly at random where
> you don't specify an upper bound, but Neil Toronto suggested
Check the math library by Neil Toronto:
https://docs.racket-lang.org/math/base.html?q=random#%28part._.Random_.Number_.Generation%29
(random-natural k) → Natural
k : Integer
Returns a random natural number less than k, which must be positive. Use
(random-natural k) instead of
6 matches
Mail list logo
