I understand that there is no law that forbids some ways of XML parsing. :)
My question is in another plain.
Perhaps some other languages have the same realization?
I am trying to understated what purpose it serves? Does this done
intentionally, or this is just random side effect?
For example
> On Nov 21, 2019, at 9:51 AM, Kira wrote:
>
> I tested sxml. And it is producer rigth (for me) output.
>
> I feel that this is wrong behavior. Because this symbols is direct
> part of one and whole element content. And must be read as "\"test qoute\"".
>
> Can please someone explain
Hi Kira,
I think this is consistent with how XML is defined. There is a
sequence of character data inside of tags. Character data is
represented by strings in the `xml` library. And there is a sequence
of those.
Jay
--
Jay McCarthy
Associate Professor @ CS @ UMass Lowell
> On Nov 21, 2019, at 11:21, James Platt wrote:
>
> If we can direct more of the energy of this community into, not just
> improving the documentation, but the way we do documentation, it would be a
> major improvement. Requiring lots of parentheses doesn't bother me. Lack of
> infix
Hello,
I am writing a gui application it is supposed to save the position of the
window and upon restart restore the position.
For this I get the position via overriding the on-move method of frame%.
Upon restoring I call (send frame move x y).
The problem is that on my system (linux manjaro
I have a few questions.
1. Consider XML like this:
testtest qoute
(string->xexpr "testtest
qoute")
Will produce this:
'(ROOT () (A () (B1 () "test") (B2 () "\"" "test qoute" "\"")))
The problem is is parsed as separate entity. You can see that they
added to list of element content as
On Nov 20, 2019, at 3:31 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
> Would it have helped if the get-directory documentation had included
> examples? Many parts of Racket's documentation are lacking in example code,
> especially the less-commonly-encountered parts.
Indeed, I have previously mentioned the lack
Hi all,
I normally build Racket from source, and, for 7.5 I decided to try Racket CS as
well.
Racket 7.5 builds fine from minimal source. Racket CS builds fine as well from
minimal source, but, when I run the command to build the rest of the
distribution.
./raco pkg install
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:11:09 -0800 (PST)
tbrooke wrote:
> I have been trying to get the path set for racket 7.5 cs on OSX -
> 7.4 cs worked fine
>
> I am not on Catalina yet. I am on Mojave 10.14.6
>
> I renamed the directory I tried adding to paths.d and still no go
>
> I get:
>
> zsh:
9 matches
Mail list logo
