Re: [racket-users] Scribble for literate dotfiles?

On 4/5/20, Karl Meakin wrote: > I want to write my dotfiles in literate programming style. As far as I can > > tell, everyone does this using Emac's org-mode. I'd rather use a > fully-fledged programming language (and not be tied to a particular > editor). Is it possible to achieve this using

Re: [racket-users] scribble include

Use `for-syntax` to import into the transformer environment: #lang scribble/base @(require (for-syntax racket/base (only-in scribble/reader make-at-reader))) @(require racket/include) foo @(include/reader "si1.inc" (make-at-reader)) bar

[racket-users] Suggestions for "The Racket Guide"

Hello there, I’m reading "The Racket Guide" online and I have a little suggestion that if you can make the code easier to copy, it will be much easier for beginners to go through. For example, just like Wolfram Language’s tutorial, if you hover your mouse over a code snippet, it will appear a