While I completely agree that testing one's function is the best practical
advice here, it also seems worth an improvement to plot. Perhaps, in
addition to saying "could not determine sensible plot bounds", it could
also say something like "because there were no points" and perhaps even
follow up
On 6/15/21, Britt Anderson wrote:
> Thanks for the help to my specific problem. More generally, what should
> have clued me in to a contract or type error when the only message received
> had to do with y plot bounds? Just looking for practical advice to help me
> figure out things on my own
Thanks for the help to my specific problem. More generally, what should
have clued me in to a contract or type error when the only message received
had to do with y plot bounds? Just looking for practical advice to help me
figure out things on my own going forward.
On Tuesday, June 15, 2021
John Carmack did so for his 10 year old. His notes may be of interest.
https://groups.google.com/g/racket-users/c/yjRuIxypUQc
On 6/15/21 1:42 PM, Nathaniel W Griswold wrote:
> Has anyone taught racket to kids, like middle school and above?
>
> I see some really basic articles when googling
Has anyone taught racket to kids, like middle school and above?
I see some really basic articles when googling around, but i was wondering if
anyone has experience with this.
Would you use the picturing-programs book? I see it's built into Racket, which
is nice.
I was thinking of something
IFL 2021
33rd Symposium on Implementation and Application of Functional Languages
venue: online
1 - 3 September 2021
Hi! I've read the issue ticket and that sure sounds like the problem! I've
installed 8.1.0.7 and I'll see if that addresses it.
Thanks very much!
On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 08:44:27 UTC-4 Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Hi, and thanks for the report!
>
> That sounds like a bug that has been fixed for
On 6/15/21, Britt Anderson wrote:
>
> I was starting to explore plot and I am getting a behavior I do not
> understand. plot doesn't seem to be able to figure out the bounds for
> something that seems pretty straight-forward. When I give bounds as an
> optional argument I don't see the line I
Hi, and thanks for the report!
That sounds like a bug that has been fixed for the next release,
especially if you opened any HTML page (such as documentation) from
DrRacket.
For more information on a previous report and the repair:
https://github.com/racket/racket/issues/3832
Snapshot
Hi!
I'm having problems with memory consumption in Racket v8.1 [cs], 64 bit on
Windows 10.
I left the IDE running overnight with a one short file open in the editor
(less than 30 lines) but nothing actually running and in the morning, I
found it it had consumed over 20GB of RAM (see attached
I was starting to explore plot and I am getting a behavior I do not
understand. plot doesn't seem to be able to figure out the bounds for
something that seems pretty straight-forward. When I give bounds as an
optional argument I don't see the line I expect to see. Can anyone provide
me some
11 matches
Mail list logo