On 2016-11-26 04:54 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
The documentation site includes links to PDFs. You could print — Matthias
For various reasons, I prefer reading PDFs when on my tablet. So what I
did was to write a kludgy shell script that mungs up a copy of the
index.html file that references
The documentation site includes links to PDFs. You could print — Matthias
> On Nov 26, 2016, at 3:22 PM, SR wrote:
>
> The "Program Contour" feature is another revelation! I appreciate, finally,
> why those "pesky" many-line declarations of things like
> ;;
, Jos
-Original Message-
From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of SR
Sent: sábado, 26 de noviembre de 2016 16:54
To: Racket Users
Subject: [racket-users] Best alternate editor/IDE for someone who gets
overwhelmed by complexity
Hi,
I
As Matthew B wrote, but in general, I think you have hit the nail on the head —
if you come from/are used to a world where the IDE governs your thinking.
With Racket we try a different approach; we want the language to govern your
thinking and we want the language to allow you to think directl
On Nov 26, 2016, at 7:54 AM, SR wrote:
> I am hoping someone out there can recommend a strong editor / IDE which makes
> it trivial to collapse blocks of code or otherwise make it a lot easier to
> navigate through long racket programs
FWIW, DrRacket does have a "Collapse S-expression" functio
Hi,
I've never been a great programmer although I've done a fair amount of
programming back in the days of C, Pascal, etc. I think racket is the right
language for me based on expressive power, etc. but I confess it currently
seems like about the worst language for me in terms of "can't see the
6 matches
Mail list logo
