The documentation's intent is to describe about syntax objects that
represent an expanded expression. When you write
(define stx #'(let ([x 5]) (+ x 6)))
then the syntax object `stx` doesn't represent an expansion. Instead,
it's a pile symbols and pairs, all with the same lexical context (taken
According to the docs [1]:
> (let ([x 5]) (+ x 6))
>
> Combining the lexical information from 'let' in the program above to 'x would
> not produce an identifier that is `free-identifier=?` to either 'x', since it
> does not appear in the scope of the 'x' binding.
If so, then what is the flaw i
2 matches
Mail list logo
