We’re way way way off topic here, so I’ll
> On Jun 16, 2019, at 3:01 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> Just to define my terms, I distinguish Leetcode-style "coding tests" from the
> old MS-style "puzzles" that Google later adopted for a while
I equated puzzles w/ undergraduate algorithm regur
Matthias Felleisen wrote on 6/16/19 12:30 PM:
Of course, good companies know by now that these “puzzle” questions are bad at
identifying good (as in above-average) sw devs. Only the average companies
still use this method because they are way behind. You want people who think
systematically an
> On Jun 16, 2019, at 3:38 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> Anyone have thoughts on whether there's anything Racket can/should do
> involving Leetcode?
>
> If you're not familiar, Leetcode is a site with bunch of coding interview
> problems that huge numbers of CS students and professionals wor
Anyone have thoughts on whether there's anything Racket can/should do
involving Leetcode?
If you're not familiar, Leetcode is a site with bunch of coding
interview problems that huge numbers of CS students and professionals
work through. For doing the problems on the site, there's several
po
4 matches
Mail list logo