Re: [racket-users] ports, custodians, and places

At Sat, 12 Mar 2016 15:35:14 -0500, Jon Zeppieri wrote: > I have TCP ports that I send from one place to another. I'd like the > receiving place to be responsible for closing them. In particular, I'd like > to make that the responsibility of a custodian in the receiving place. > > If I close the

[racket-users] ports, custodians, and places

I have TCP ports that I send from one place to another. I'd like the receiving place to be responsible for closing them. In particular, I'd like to make that the responsibility of a custodian in the receiving place. If I close the ports in the receiving place, however, that doesn't actually close