very helpful that you linked to the issue, thank you. I now understand there
are non-trivial problem domain issues (for example, “CDT” is ambiguous,
probably even with locale specified.)
I will think about how to tackle my specific problem and whether I can help
with issues like these.
--
Thanks for the quick reply, Jon!
OK, good to know. Maybe I can add the ones I need (if I can figure out how...).
:)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
Only a small number of zone formats are supported in parsing mode.
This is discussed a bit in https://github.com/97jaz/gregor/issues/25.
The situation could definitely be improved.
- Jon
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:33 AM Tim Hanson wrote:
>
> p.s. I'm stuck on parsing one pattern that comes up
p.s. I'm stuck on parsing one pattern that comes up in my data. Here's a
corresponding test:
(parameterize ([current-locale "en"])
(check-equal?
(parse-datetime "Sun, 21 Jun 2015 17:50:44 -0500 (CDT)" "EEE, dd MMM
HH:mm:ss ()") (datetime 2015 6 21 17 50
Thanks, Jon!
I agree with your analysis and thoughts about which cases should always raise
exceptions. (I can't recall whether you scan patterns that include
semi-redundant information such as day-of-week; wondered just now whether a
contradictory day of week would be another category of
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 2:38 AM Tim Hanson wrote:
>
> hi, I've installed and am trying out
>
> Gregor: a date and time library for Racket
>
> and find it to be very powerful and useful.
Thanks!
>
> In my current application (digging through mail headers) I'm wondering
> whether there is a
Thanks. Something like that will let me proceed for now.
I'd still be curious what folks think about an approach avoiding exceptions.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
On 4/27/20, Tim Hanson wrote:
>
> I thought I'd check here:
> - does this seem like a reasonable idea?
> - is mine an unusual use case and most folks know what format to expect and
> the exception approach is fine?
I've written code like this before and used it in a contract.
```
(define
8 matches
Mail list logo
