What do you mean by "fenetre media"?
/Jens Axel
2016-12-31 7:44 GMT+01:00 Masto Fine :
> Comment editer un prigramme drracket dans une fenetre media
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Racket Users" group.
> To
Seconding the suggestion for racket-mode. Great job, Greg.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard
wrote:
> You can edit Racket programs in for example Emacs or Sublime.
> Use the command racket in a terminal to run the program.
> Some editors have special
You can edit Racket programs in for example Emacs or Sublime.
Use the command racket in a terminal to run the program.
Some editors have special modes for editing racket.
See
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWiteH8PARQ
https://github.com/greghendershott/racket-mode
/Jens Axel
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Ben Greenman
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:45 PM, David Storrs
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Can I assume that the elements of keys are in the same order as are
>> the elements of vals?
>
>
> No, because
As one data point, here's a histogram of the 20k or so calls to
number->string that happen during the start up of DrRacket (first
entry in each list is the argument passed to number->string and the
second is the number of times that call happened):
'((0 2399)
(1 8116)
(2 4278)
(3 2196)
(4
(PS: those are the calls only in the special case that a fixnum was
supplied and it was base 10 or base 16.)
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> As one data point, here's a histogram of the 20k or so calls to
> number->string that happen during
> On Dec 31, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Matthew Butterick wrote:
>
>> I started with Ryan's code from `~r` and tried to emulate some special
>> cases I see the C code (and didn't worry about negative numbers) and
>> ended up with something 4-5x slower than the C code version. :( Code
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> Is it cheating to avoid divisions by using table lookups?
Everything is fair in love, war, and benchmarking. :)
But this introduces an additional cost that's a little bit more
troublesome to measure. Specifically,
8 matches
Mail list logo