I configured Tab key according a solution found somewhere:
#lang s-exp framework/keybinding-lang
(keybinding "tab" (λ(editor event) (send editor auto-complete)))
It works but I wonder is it possible to setup it like in emacs in
racket-mode:
1. Repeating key pressing complete common part
On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 3:19:06 AM UTC+8 Ben Greenman wrote:
> On 6/15/21, Britt Anderson wrote:
> > Thanks for the help to my specific problem. More generally, what should
> > have clued me in to a contract or type error when the only message
> received
> > had to do with y plot
I'm getting bytes off the wire and attempting to write them to a port. I
have a check in place to verify that the pipe has free space but when I
attempt to reports that yes, there is space, and then it writes and fails
regardless and I'm not sure why. The following is a simplified version of
the
Hello,
Issue 51 of RN is online. Enjoy!
https://racket-news.com/2021/06/racket-news-issue-51.html
--
Paulo Matos
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
On 6/16/2021 1:19 PM, David Storrs wrote:
I'm getting bytes off the wire and attempting to write them to a
port. I have a check in place to verify that the pipe has free space
but when I attempt to reports that yes, there is space, and then it
writes and fails regardless and I'm not sure
Got it. Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 3:45 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:25:40 -0400, George Neuner wrote:
> > It looks like the problem
> > is that "flush" is not defined ...
>
> Yes, "returns without blocking after writing as many bytes as it can
> immediately flush" is
For the record, it doesn't work in 8.1 either.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:44 PM David Storrs wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:25 PM George Neuner
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 6/16/2021 2:16 PM, David Storrs wrote:
>>
>> Damn. Sorry, I posted out of sync versions of code and output. This is
>>
At Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:25:40 -0400, George Neuner wrote:
> It looks like the problem
> is that "flush" is not defined ...
Yes, "returns without blocking after writing as many bytes as it can
immediately flush" is vague, and more or less intentionally so. The
intent it really "writes as much as
Related to talk on signals...
How come Racket has exn:break:hang-up and exn:break:terminate but not something
for SIGINT exceptions. How do you handle SIGINT? I mean i guess you get a
`exn:break?` when it happens but there's kinda no way to distinguish that it's
a SIGINT other than it just not
On 6/16/2021 3:45 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:25:40 -0400, George Neuner wrote:
> It looks like the problem
> is that "flush" is not defined ...
Yes, "returns without blocking after writing as many bytes as it can
immediately flush" is vague, and more or less
There's a quickscript that does something similar, but not quite what you
want:
https://github.com/Metaxal/quickscript-extra/blob/master/scripts/dynamic-abbrev.rkt
It does cycle through completions by pressing the same keybinding
repeatedly, but it autocompletes only according to the words that
Damn. Sorry, I posted out of sync versions of code and output. This is
correct:
(define bstr (make-shared-bytes 509 5))
(define rx-pipe-size 16777216)
(define-values (rx-in rx-out) (make-pipe rx-pipe-size))
(define (room-in-rx-pipe? bstr)
(define avail (- rx-pipe-size (pipe-content-length
On 6/16/2021 2:16 PM, David Storrs wrote:
Damn. Sorry, I posted out of sync versions of code and output. This
is correct:
(define bstr (make-shared-bytes 509 5))
(define rx-pipe-size 16777216)
(define-values (rx-in rx-out) (make-pipe rx-pipe-size))
(define (room-in-rx-pipe? bstr)
(define
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:25 PM George Neuner wrote:
>
> On 6/16/2021 2:16 PM, David Storrs wrote:
>
> Damn. Sorry, I posted out of sync versions of code and output. This is
> correct:
>
> (define bstr (make-shared-bytes 509 5))
> (define rx-pipe-size 16777216)
> (define-values (rx-in rx-out)
In case anyone else runs into this issue and is worried about their code
blocking forever, here's a version that will time out. The only change is
the use of sync/timeout and value-evt.
https://docs.racket-lang.org/value-evt/index.html
(require value-evt)
(define bstr (make-shared-bytes 509 5))
On 6/16/2021 7:01 PM, Shu-Hung You wrote:
Out of curiosity, I wrapped David's code in a loop and tried to write
509 bytes in each iteration. From the output, it looks like CS doesn't
implement pipes using a fixed-size buffer. I'm also not sure how many
different buffers there are. I think this
Forgot to mention this is using CS 8.1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on
Out of curiosity, I wrapped David's code in a loop and tried to write
509 bytes in each iteration. From the output, it looks like CS doesn't
implement pipes using a fixed-size buffer. I'm also not sure how many
different buffers there are. I think this has something to do with
George's question.
18 matches
Mail list logo
