Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread Philip McGrath
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:30 PM Ben Greenman wrote: > On 9/28/21, David Storrs wrote: > > $ raco pkg remove try-catch > > raco pkg remove: invalid `deps' specification > > specification: '("base" racket/format racket/string) > > > > That is not the deps specification from the info.rkt file so

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread Robby Findler
I'm not quite following from the thread, but it sure sounds like there is a bug in raco setup (or similar) somewhere that isn't reporting an error properly. Is that the case? Robby On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 4:12 PM David Storrs wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:30 PM Ben Greenman > wrote:

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread David Storrs
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:30 PM Ben Greenman wrote: > On 9/28/21, David Storrs wrote: > > > Also, any ideas on why the remove fails? > > > > $ raco pkg remove try-catch > > raco pkg remove: invalid `deps' specification > > specification: '("base" racket/format racket/string) > > > > That is

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread Ben Greenman
On 9/28/21, David Storrs wrote: > *fists of rage* > > I'm glad it worked for you, and that it works for me if I repeat your > steps. I have no idea why it wasn't working given that I was using the > local copy of the git repository that is the source of what's on github. > Argh. Weird ... glad

[racket-users] [ANN] try-catch - exception handling with dynamic-wind guarantees

2021-09-28 Thread David Storrs
Module name: try-catch https://pkgd.racket-lang.org/pkgn/package/try-catch Lisp stereotypically has a problem that it's super easy to write your own code so the library ecosystem ends up fractured, with multiple options to do the same thing. McCarthy forbid that I should break the stereotype,

Re: [racket-users] [ANN] fmt: a Racket code formatter

2021-09-28 Thread David Storrs
This is very cool, Sorawee. Thank you for sharing. On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 2:03 PM Sorawee Porncharoenwase < sorawee.pw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Announcing the pre-alpha version of fmt, a Racket code formatter. Code > formatter is a tool that reformats your code so that it conforms to a style >

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread David Storrs
*fists of rage* I'm glad it worked for you, and that it works for me if I repeat your steps. I have no idea why it wasn't working given that I was using the local copy of the git repository that is the source of what's on github. Argh. Regardless, thank you very much for your help. I've fixed

[racket-users] [ANN] fmt: a Racket code formatter

2021-09-28 Thread Sorawee Porncharoenwase
Announcing the pre-alpha version of fmt, a Racket code formatter. Code formatter is a tool that reformats your code so that it conforms to a style consistently. - Source: https://github.com/sorawee/fmt/ - Documentation and demo: https://docs.racket-lang.org/fmt/ As a part of this work, I

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread Sorawee Porncharoenwase
> > When I manually run > > $ cd try-catch/scribblings/ && scribble try-catch.scbl > > I get the try-catch.html file as expected but racket/base functions such > as with-handlers are not properly linked -- i.e. they appear in blue with a > red line under them and are not links. > - As I

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread Ben Greenman
On 9/28/21, David Storrs wrote: > Summary: Documentation for a new module is not being generated when I > would expect it to be and when I do it manually it ends up not linking > basic Racket items. I've done a lot of searching to figure it out and > would appreciate some help. I cloned the

[racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread David Storrs
Summary: Documentation for a new module is not being generated when I would expect it to be and when I do it manually it ends up not linking basic Racket items. I've done a lot of searching to figure it out and would appreciate some help. Long version: I published a module a few days ago

[racket-users] Re: Strange readline/racket-mode behavior

2021-09-28 Thread Tony Garnock-Jones
Hi Winston, I've submitted a suggested improvement to interactive REPLish behaviour around read-char and read-line here: https://github.com/racket/racket/pull/4007 Please let me know if it improves the situation for you. And of course, if anyone else has comments about this kind of thing,