I think a pull request is the right idea.
When requests like that fall in my area of maintenance, sometimes I've
merged them, and sometimes I've suggested that a package would be
better. I thought the pull request was helpful either way.
Matthew
At Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:37:13 -0800 (PST), Brian Ad
The easiest way to get the right module path to refer to a
documentation section is click the section title. For example, if you
click on
XML: Parsing and Writing
then this text will appear below the title:
Link to this document with
@other-doc['(lib "xml/xml.scrbl")]
It looks like "doc.r
From the Scribble documentation for a third-party package, how do I
link to:
* a core Racket document; and
* the documentation for a third-party package from the catalog?
Ideally, in both cases it would go to locally-installed documentation,
if available, and fallback to "docs.racket-lang.org" i
What is the process for providing additions to Racket's standard library? Do
people just submit pull requests, or is there a particular vetting process, to
determine whether a function is generally useful enough to warrant inclusion in
the standard library, that should happen first to avoid clut
Hello,
I'm building a library module using typed/racket, and wanted to provide macros
associated with some of the typed functions to untyped modules.
Naturally macros from typed/racket cannot be used by untyped code, so I was
experimenting with some organization options to isolate the macros in
>> Maybe some Racketeers would scout Gambit, Chicken, Bigloo, Guile, etc.,
>> communities for any useful packages that Racket doesn't yet have, and
#lang Gambit
?
!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
me too.
Thank you!
Jeff
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Jeffrey Edgington wrote:
>
> Version 6.3
>
>
>> On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the report. Which version are you using? I'm seeing that
>> the behavior appears in 6.3 but is fixed in 6.4.
>>
>> On W
No need to stop at packages - whole languages. (I fancy doing Self when I
am a better programmer)
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 at 21:23, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Brian Adkins wrote on 02/24/2016 02:49 PM:
> > it appears to me that Racket is the strongest of the Scheme-ey lisps, so
> that's where I'm invest
Version 6.3
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report. Which version are you using? I'm seeing that
> the behavior appears in 6.3 but is fixed in 6.4.
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Jeffrey Edgington wrote:
>> I am getting an unexpected message from c
Thanks for the report. Which version are you using? I'm seeing that
the behavior appears in 6.3 but is fixed in 6.4.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Jeffrey Edgington wrote:
> I am getting an unexpected message from check-expect when I try the following:
>
> #lang racket
> (require test-engine/r
Brian Adkins wrote on 02/24/2016 02:49 PM:
it appears to me that Racket is the strongest of the Scheme-ey lisps, so that's
where I'm investing my time.
After maintaining my open source packages on ~10 different
R4/5RS+SRFI-ish Scheme implementations, I came to a similar conclusion:
now I jus
I am getting an unexpected message from check-expect when I try the following:
#lang racket
(require test-engine/racket-tests)
(struct element (x y) #:transparent)
(define (make-element-list n)
(for*/list ([i n][j n]) (element (+ i 1) (+ j 1
(check-expect (make-element-list 1) 0)
(test)
It's always tricky when the bags of juices and meat get involved. :)
I'm definitely planning to never stop throwing my weight into Racket.
Robby
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Brian Adkins wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 2:40:23 PM UTC-5, Robby Findler wrote:
>> Scheme is great.
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 2:40:23 PM UTC-5, Robby Findler wrote:
> Scheme is great. Racket isn't Scheme, although it draws a ton of
> inspiration from the language and it's design. Viva Scheme! Viva
> Racket!
>
> Robby
I agree, but I have mixed emotions. The lisp community is better than
I see! thank you so much Vincent.
- Rodrigo
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Vincent St-Amour
> wrote:
>
> Rodrigo,
>
> As you say, the types do indeed all match up. The issue is that TR's
> inference is not powerful enough to figure it out on its own.
>
> The particular limitation here is a
Scheme is great. Racket isn't Scheme, although it draws a ton of
inspiration from the language and it's design. Viva Scheme! Viva
Racket!
Robby
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Martin DeMello wrote:
> I don't know about scheme being racket; both chicken and gambit seem to have
> reasonably acti
Rodrigo,
As you say, the types do indeed all match up. The issue is that TR's
inference is not powerful enough to figure it out on its own.
The particular limitation here is applications of polymorphic functions
(`map`) to polymorphic arguments (`car`).
If you annotate (or instantiate) either `m
http://everythingisaremix.info/watch-the-series/
Their title kind of casts a light on the way we judge research, eh?
Robby
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> Yeap.
>
> And fwiw, I am perfectly aware that Edison did not invent the light bulb or,
> more generally, tha
Yeap.
And fwiw, I am perfectly aware that Edison did not invent the light bulb or,
more generally, that re-invention (separated by decades and longer) is a
cross-disciplinary phenomenon.
On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:10 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> The possibility of reinvention and parallel invent
The possibility of reinvention and parallel invention... is of course
still better than the opposite extreme. :)
Neil V.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
I don't know about scheme being racket; both chicken and gambit seem to
have reasonably active communities.
I was also surprised at the 16k hits for pony, which has essentially no
ecosystem yet. but actually doing the google search it seems like there's
tons of noise in there.
martin
On Wed, Feb
I exaggerated a little bit as far as the Halting Problem is concerned.
On Feb 24, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Stephen De Gabrielle
wrote:
> Thank you,
> I thought you might be exaggerating until I saw the Fox Project web page
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~fox/
>
> Sadly I can't find fluxkit. It sometimes
It's not called fluxkit. It's OSkit but the Flux research group:
https://www.cs.utah.edu/flux/oskit/
It should still be in the configure script for Racket.
Jay
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Stephen De Gabrielle
wrote:
> Thank you,
> I thought you might be exaggerating until I saw the Fox P
Hello,
My apologizes if this questions have already been answer in this list, I may
have missed.
I'm trying to make this expression work in typed/racket:
(map car '((1 . 2) (3 . 4)))
But if fails with the following type error:
; Type Checker: Polymorphic function `map' could not be
; ap
Cool!
Now we just need to find a way to detect when people say Scheme but
really mean Racket. ;)
Vincent
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:33:46 -0600,
Brian Adkins wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 12:24:59 PM UTC-5, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> > If we add up the "Racket" and "Scheme" numbers
Our Racket-based startup, StarShine Planet, is developing software to help
young kids learn reading, math, and systems thinking, while growing into whole,
happy, successful human beings. We’re developing apps targeted for Android,
which means we're also committed to porting Racket to Android.
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 12:24:59 PM UTC-5, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> If we add up the "Racket" and "Scheme" numbers (the latter being, I
> suspect, mostly Racket), the total is pretty close to Ruby. I find that
> amusing. :)
>
> Actually, I'm curious what the numbers look like if you co
Thank you,
I thought you might be exaggerating until I saw the Fox Project web page
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~fox/
Sadly I can't find fluxkit. It sometimes seems like history is written by
Google and Wikipedia. Doing a literature review is expensive and time
consuming.
> Computer science is the disc
If we add up the "Racket" and "Scheme" numbers (the latter being, I
suspect, mostly Racket), the total is pretty close to Ruby. I find that
amusing. :)
Actually, I'm curious what the numbers look like if you count "PLT
Scheme" towards Racket.
Vincent
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:06:51 -0600,
Brian A
I began compiling very crude statistics on programming language popularity back
in 2009, and just kept doing it periodically. Initially I did it manually, but
I finally got smart and wrote the following Racket program to scrape the
results automatically:
https://gist.github.com/lojic/83fff86aee
In the late 90s, all of us had a FluxKit image on our laptops that would boot
PLT Scheme on the raw machine. Matthew, with help from the Flux people, put it
together in a relatively short time. I am sure more could have done with that,
but we went in different directions.
At Strange Loop I s
Jens Axel, hello.
On 24 Feb 2016, at 14:04, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
What happens if /Library/Tex/texbin is present - but not in the path?
A good point.
Using Matthew's reminder of the existence of find-executable-path (which
I've used before, but was too focused on "system" here), how ab
What happens if /Library/Tex/texbin is present - but not in the path?
/Jens Axel
2016-02-24 14:34 GMT+01:00 Stephen De Gabrielle :
> Thank you - very good advice - I'll have to change my pull request.
> S.
>
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 at 10:57, Norman Gray wrote:
>
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> On 23 Feb
I recommend `find-executable-path` instead of `system` plus "which".
At Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:34:19 +, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> Thank you - very good advice - I'll have to change my pull request.
> S.
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 at 10:57, Norman Gray wrote:
>
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> > On 23 Feb
Hi,
Has anyone ever done a racket machine image like:
• Mirage https://mirage.io
• LING/Erlang on Xen http://erlangonxen.org
• Rumprum https://github.com/rumpkernel/rumprun
I heard a podcast and recently saw an old presentation [1] that was
interesting. I'm interested, but never had the motivation
BTW, the `html-parsing` package in the new package system is now my
official one.
(i'm in the middle of moving ~25 packages from PLaneT, and am tracking
the status at "http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/";.)
Neil V.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thank you - very good advice - I'll have to change my pull request.
S.
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 at 10:57, Norman Gray wrote:
>
> Greetings
>
> On 23 Feb 2016, at 20:46, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>
> > Use case: The paths to LaTeX has changed on El Capitan,
> > which makes it difficult to choose a defau
On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 11:46:17 AM UTC-5, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> BTW, I now intend to move my packages to the new package system shortly,
> and I'll then stop supporting the PLaneT ones.
>
> (There's some urgency to moving now, so I'm going to punt on workarounds
> for the version-relat
Greetings
On 23 Feb 2016, at 20:46, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
Use case: The paths to LaTeX has changed on El Capitan,
which makes it difficult to choose a default path, that works
for all.
Addressing that particular use-case (following the motto that one should
test the functionality rather
Hey all, I've made some pretty significant changes to the racket Docker images:
1) 6.4 and 6.3 support (took long enough...)
2) Onbuild images for running and testing apps for every 6.x version,
additionally the onbuild images were changed to run "racket main.rkt" as their
command after doing a
40 matches
Mail list logo