Re: [racket-users] Open source projects

I am currently a senior in college. I have done some research in machine learning and computer security, but I wouldn't say I am particularly proficient at either. I have interests in different areas of computing including machine learning, computer security, graphics, and numerical analysis.

[racket-users] Re: Open source projects

Welcome, we're very glad to have you! Open source Racket projects are scattered all over the place, but here are some good ways to find actively maintained and hopefully accessible projects that might interest you: - Watch some talks from recent RacketCons, especially the most recent one

Re: [racket-users] Open source projects

> > I am very new to the community and am looking for an open source project to > work on. I was wondering if anybody knows of some good resources for finding > open source projects or any recommendations. I appreciate any help I can get. Do you have any particular areas of skill like

[racket-users] Open source projects

Hello all, I am very new to the community and am looking for an open source project to work on. I was wondering if anybody knows of some good resources for finding open source projects or any recommendations. I appreciate any help I can get. Thank you for your time, Gus -- You received this

Re: [racket-users] desired behavior on error-during expected for check-expect?

> On Oct 19, 2017, at 5:21 PM, 'John Clements' via users-redirect > wrote: > > I was debugging some student code today, and I was momentarily thrown by a > message that said “both tests passed!” when most of the code was not getting > run. It turned out that there was

[racket-users] desired behavior on error-during expected for check-expect?

I was debugging some student code today, and I was momentarily thrown by a message that said “both tests passed!” when most of the code was not getting run. It turned out that there was an error being signalled during the evaluation of the expected value. To see this, try this code in beginner:

Re: [racket-users] code reflection

> On Oct 19, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > > These looks interesting, thanks! I'll have a closer look later. > I guess that some people would object to making all-upper-case a > semantic marker, but in terms of readability this looks nice. BTW I got some

Re: [racket-users] code reflection

Matthew, > If your goal is readable code, why not add some sugar? That's a perfectly good solution. > More broadly, it feels like there's plenty of room for new > macro-definition and syntax-processing forms that suit different > ergonomic needs: readability, automatic error messages,

Re: [racket-users] code reflection

> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Konrad Hinsen > wrote: > > Matthias, > >> Please search my post for ‘hygiene’. I didn’t mention the word. Off — >> Matthias > > Oops, you are right, sorry. Your example used "let", which is also what > everybody used for discussing

Re: [racket-users] code reflection

Matthias, > Please search my post for ‘hygiene’. I didn’t mention the word. Off — Matthias Oops, you are right, sorry. Your example used "let", which is also what everybody used for discussing hygiene, so I jumped to conclusions. Your argument is that pattern matching works at a higher level of