On 27 Aug 2018, at 11:41, Jérôme Martin wrote:
Talking about web development could be nice too, but I'm not feeling
confident enough in my exploration of writing Racket for the web to be
able
to survive the flow of questions about load-balancing and server
rendering
buzz.
(I'm an experienced
Hi Jerome,
On 27 Aug 2018, at 11:41, Jérôme Martin wrote:
I live not so far from Bruxelles so I'd be glad to be a part of it!
Awesome! I think there are a fair number of European Racketeers out
there, enough to justify at least a (small-ish) meeting.
My understanding is that the whole "Eur
FYI, some related work i didn't see mentioned in the thread: a language for
writing legal contracts, as natural language documents which can be attached to
computation logic: https://docs.accordproject.org/
--
Sent from my phoneamajig
> On Aug 25, 2018, at 02:45, Richard Parsons wrote:
>
> H
Philip McGrath wrote on 08/27/2018 11:12 AM:
What I'm currently exploring, though, is writing a helper program in
Racket using the FFI. It will probably read a list of paths from
standard in and write a hash table to standard out mapping each path
to its validation result. I still plan to run t
That is extremely good advice that I absolutely intend to follow. Here's a
bit about what I'm doing:
At Digital Ricoeur (https://digitalricoeur.org/), we have a corpus of
hundreds of XML documents and growing, some of them book-length. These must
be validated against a custom DTD that is derived f
Rather than use FFI, would it work for your purposes to have the libxml2
code in a separate process from Racket? That would avoid the likely C
memory bugs corrupting your Racket process.
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1962/product_id-3311/Xmlsoft-Libxml2.html
I've done
> > I'd love to talk about how easy it is to write DSLs in Racket, and
about
> > how you can replace your data with DSLs.
>
> Isn't there a tutorial (in text, not video) somewhere about this?
> It shouldn't require going to a meeting.
I know right.
It's more about promoting Racket through a
I didn't know before I tried it either. It occurred to me as a candidate
because I've seen many warnings about conflating ordinary pointers and
function pointers (although usually the warning is that they are not
guaranteed to have the same size). I only discovered that note in the
docs afterwa
Thanks for the very quick reply—using `_fpointer` seems to work for me,
too. I don't think I'd noticed it in the docs before, though, even if I
had, I don't think it would have been obvious to me that it was the
solution to this problem.
-Philip
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:03 AM Ryan Culpepper wr
On 08/27/2018 02:13 PM, Philip McGrath wrote:
I am hoping for some help debugging a problem I'm having writing FFI
bindings for libxml2.
I am trying to use the function `xmlValidateDtd`, which (predictably)
validates an XML document against a DTD. To support error reporting, the
first argumen
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 02:41:52AM -0700, Jérôme Martin wrote:
> I live not so far from Bruxelles so I'd be glad to be a part of it!
>
> I'd love to talk about how easy it is to write DSLs in Racket, and about
> how you can replace your data with DSLs.
Isn't there a tutorial (in text, not video)
I am hoping for some help debugging a problem I'm having writing FFI
bindings for libxml2.
I am trying to use the function `xmlValidateDtd`, which (predictably)
validates an XML document against a DTD. To support error reporting, the
first argument to the function is a pointer to an `xmlValidCtxt`
I live not so far from Bruxelles so I'd be glad to be a part of it!
I'd love to talk about how easy it is to write DSLs in Racket, and about
how you can replace your data with DSLs.
Something like "Who needs JSON when you can DSL?".
One of the examples would be Scribble, but I'm also thinking abo
Hi Amirouche,
A scheme european event would be a great idea. Jesse is trying to get
something together for 2019 - although Racket specific afaik.
Still, I have to give my 2 cents on FOSDEM. I think it's pretty bad.
I have been super-frustrated for two consecutive years and gave up on
it. The prob
14 matches
Mail list logo