Re: Make, in place build, was Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-09-11 Thread Gustavo Massaccesi
I'm using: make in-place PKGS="racket-test-core" This install only a small set of packages, so the build time is short. Also, the time of "raco setup" is smaller. I usually add a few additional packages when I need them, for example "compiler-lib". Gustavo On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:06 AM, A

Re: Make, in place build, was Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-09-10 Thread Anthony Carrico
On 09/10/2015 08:40 PM, Anthony Carrico wrote: > I'll forward you a transcript of a failed build. FYI: Off list Matthew suggested that it ran out of memory, and indeed the build succeeds with more free memory. -- Anthony Carrico -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the G

Re: Make, in place build, was Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-09-10 Thread Anthony Carrico
On 09/10/2015 04:27 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:10:27 -0400, Anthony Carrico wrote: >> This failed to >> build, I guess because of package mismatches, so I pulled and tried >> again, which failed. > > I'm a little curious about that failure, but many things can go wrong > at

Re: Make, in place build, was Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-09-10 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:10:27 -0400, Anthony Carrico wrote: > I did a 2 character change to Racket (see > https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/1045), and hit make. For that case, I would use `raco setup` instead of `make` (since it's not a change to the runtime). Or I might use `make as-is`, which re

Make, in place build, was Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-09-10 Thread Anthony Carrico
I did a 2 character change to Racket (see https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/1045), and hit make. This failed to build, I guess because of package mismatches, so I pulled and tried again, which failed. Also, my laptop is very slow for this kind of thing, so I did a fresh clone and in place build on

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-24 Thread Anthony Carrico
On 06/23/2015 08:39 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > I hope this helps, Yes very much, just that simple. Reading carefully, the INSTALL.txt docs are quite good, and the git section in the manual too. Knowing about the new split repo set up the expectation for a split build, and INSTALL.txt buries the lea

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-23 Thread Jay McCarthy
Yes, it is already included in the .gitignore file. I guess I meant it's not special to _Racket_, but it is useful to have a convention for stuff like git and helping others. :) Jay On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote: > PS The 'extra-pkgs' directory is a tiny bit special:

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-23 Thread Matthew Butterick
PS The 'extra-pkgs' directory is a tiny bit special: http://docs.racket-lang.org/pkg/git-workflow.html?q=git#%28part._clone-link%29 On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Anthony Carrico > wrote: > > On 06/19/2015 11:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-23 Thread Jay McCarthy
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Anthony Carrico wrote: > On 06/19/2015 11:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: >> With this release we are taking a major step forward to get our user >> community even more involved than in the past... > > It looks like I'm running currently running a snapshot. I've ran f

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-23 Thread Anthony Carrico
On 06/23/2015 04:26 PM, Anthony Carrico wrote: > On 06/19/2015 11:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: >> With this release we are taking a major step forward to get our user >> community even more involved than in the past... > > It looks like I'm running currently running a snapshot. I've ran from > git

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-23 Thread Anthony Carrico
On 06/19/2015 11:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > With this release we are taking a major step forward to get our user > community even more involved than in the past... It looks like I'm running currently running a snapshot. I've ran from github before, but I'll admit I'm not sure where I'd go to u

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-21 Thread Neil Toronto
On 06/19/2015 11:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: * A `--clone` option for `raco pkg install` or `raco pkg update` facilitates Git-based package development. If a package X has a Git repository source, installing and updating the package pulls from the repository in a read-only mode. Using

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-20 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
> Is there anything I can do to help get the Racket distributions for Windows > and OS X code signed so they can be run without scary warning dialogs in the > default OS configuration? I'm more than willing to sponsor the cost of any > necessary certificates or developer programs. Failing that,

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-20 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 10:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > > Racket version 6.2 is now available from > >http://racket-lang.org/ Congratulations and many thanks to the maintainers on the release! Is there anything I can do to help get the Racket distributions for Windows and OS X code signed

[racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-19 Thread Ryan Culpepper
Racket version 6.2 is now available from http://racket-lang.org/ With this release we are taking a major step forward to get our user community even more involved than in the past. Over the past six months, we have re-organized the Racket code base into a small core code repo and many other