On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
You might be interested in the language Styx, the language that goes with
the Inferno operating system. I believe it uses reference counting up
front, with full garbage collection as a backstop.
The language is
I also forgot to reply to the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Doug Williams m.douglas.willi...@gmail.com
Date: Jul 23, 2015 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [racket-users] What limits would you put on racket?
To: Sayth Renshaw flebber.c...@gmail.com
Cc:
If you're strictly comparing Racket
* Browser-side AJAX-y apps, both underlying browser stuff and layered
frameworks/libraries. Developing for this is largely about cursing
frequently -- every time you're reminded that people who have little idea
what they're doing have now determined the platforms that everyone must
build
2015-07-24 2:48 GMT+03:00 Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org:
On Racket, CL, limits, programmers...
I've found that most stuff can be done in Racket, and, though I have used
CL when required by two consulting clients' prior implementation choices,
I'm not aware that CL has any key advantages
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:57:29PM -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Hendrik Boom wrote on 07/23/2015 08:15 PM:
I've heard that half-life waswritten in a versino of Lisp. But the
battles in half-life tend to be short, so they explicitly called
the garbage collector between battles.
And now HL3 is
Just in case, you might want to check out Racket's places and futures
constructs.
On Friday, July 24, 2015, Dmitry Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-07-24 2:48 GMT+03:00 Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','n...@neilvandyke.org');:
On Racket, CL, limits,
Half-life was written in C on my Quake 1 codebase.
-Original Message-
From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Hendrik Boom
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:15 PM
To: Racket Users
Subject: Re: [racket-users] What limits would you put
First of all, the first field I am interested in Computer Science can
reasonably marked as Programming Language itself.
Before I chose Racket, I used C and Java/ActionScript at work.
now Racket is the major one (among all languages not only lisp dialects) in
my life.
Many people choose Clojure
On Racket, CL, limits, programmers...
I've found that most stuff can be done in Racket, and, though I have
used CL when required by two consulting clients' prior implementation
choices, I'm not aware that CL has any key advantages over Racket. (Not
bashing CL; it's a nice platform, with an
Hendrik Boom wrote on 07/23/2015 08:15 PM:
I've heard that half-life waswritten in a versino of Lisp. But the
battles in half-life tend to be short, so they explicitly called the
garbage collector between battles.
And now HL3 is merely delayed by a *really* long deferred GC cycle? :)
But
I received a direct reply from Doug.
If you're strictly comparing Racket to other Lisp dialects, I would say there
is never any reason to go to a different Lisp dialect. The main exception would
be if there is some specific, existing capability in a different language that
you require. But,
I think he's asking, when would you *not* use racket for something?
What problems is it particularly suited towards, and what areas is it
weak in?
I'd also like to know how the list would answer this.
PS sorry for forgetting to cc the list on my last msg Matthais.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:59
On Jul 23, 2015, at 12:51 AM, Sayth Renshaw flebber.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Just getting reacquainted with Racket going back through HTDP 2nd edition and
the edx intro course.
Is there a point where you would say yeah Racket shouldn't go there, it's
best at A B or C you should go to
Hi
Just getting reacquainted with Racket going back through HTDP 2nd edition and
the edx intro course.
Is there a point where you would say yeah Racket shouldn't go there, it's best
at A B or C you should go to Chez, Sbcl, CCL etc.
Sayth
--
You received this message because you are
14 matches
Mail list logo
