Re: [racket-users] Difficulty using subprocess

You can also use `file-stream-buffer-mode` instead of manually flushing the port: https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/port-buffers.html#(def._((quote._~23~25kernel)._file-stream-buffer-mode)) -Philip On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:07 PM Brian Adkins wrote: > That was it - thanks! I guess I was

Re: [racket-users] Difficulty using subprocess

That was it - thanks! I guess I was spoiled by Ruby's auto-flushing of "puts". On Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 2:02:07 PM UTC-5, Philippe M wrote: > > Hi Brian > > I think you need to add a call to flush-output after sending data to outp > > Regards > Philippe > > > Le jeu. 15 nov. 2018 à

[racket-users] Difficulty using subprocess

I'm porting a Ruby application to Racket (will be deployed on Linux, but I'm developing on OSX). It uses the s3270 terminal emulator to access a mainframe. An example in Ruby is: IO.popen('s3270 L:ssl3270.example.com:2023', 'r+') do |pipe| pipe.puts "ascii" puts (pipe.gets) puts

Re: [racket-users] Difficulty using subprocess

Hi Brian I think you need to add a call to flush-output after sending data to outp Regards Philippe Le jeu. 15 nov. 2018 à 19:51, Brian Adkins a écrit : > I'm porting a Ruby application to Racket (will be deployed on Linux, but > I'm developing on OSX). It uses the s3270 terminal emulator to

Re: [racket-users] Difficulty using subprocess

Good tip - I think (file-stream-buffer-mode outp 'line) makes sense in this case given it's a terminal emulator. On Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 2:50:33 PM UTC-5, Philip McGrath wrote: > > You can also use `file-stream-buffer-mode` instead of manually flushing > the port: >