On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 12:46:53 AM UTC-4, David Storrs wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019, 11:43 PM Sage Gerard > wrote:
>
>>
>> Maybe I'm overthinking this. I already know that nothing in #lang racket
>> is getting thrown out or anything.
>
>
> Yes, it is.
>
I believe Sage's statement
At Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:03:42 -0700, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> Did SFC do so in this case? No idea. Before the switch, Karen Sandler
> from SFC circulated [2] a template agreement [3] but AFAIK the actual
> agreement that Racket's core team signed, and the details thereof,
> has never been shared
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 9:01:51 AM UTC-5, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > Lingering elsewhere: the relicensing project that commenced more than
> > 2.5 years ago [5] — not clear whether under the SFC this effort is
> > alive, dead, or what. Of course, Galaxy's Edge took 3 yrs to build,
> >
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 10:45:33 AM UTC-5, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
>
> A pulse and keyboard is a good start, but the task requires significant
> initiative to work with the Conservancy to get guidance and make sure
> things move along. The process may possibly involve contacting
>
Thanks for volunteering! I'll follow-up off-list.
Sam
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:14 PM 'Joel Dueck' via Racket Users
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 10:45:33 AM UTC-5, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>>
>>
>> A pulse and keyboard is a good start, but the task requires significant
>> initiative
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 11:27:41 AM UTC-5, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
>
> Thanks for volunteering! I'll follow-up off-list.
>
> Sam
>
Sure thing. Just minutes ago I dug up the Relicensing Permission issue on
GitHub
and found you have made significant progress. Not looking to wrest this
Joining in. I want to be part of this.
-slg
Original Message
On Aug 29, 2019, 12:31 PM, 'Joel Dueck' via Racket Users wrote:
> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 11:27:41 AM UTC-5, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
>> Thanks for volunteering! I'll follow-up off-list.
>>
>> Sam
>
>
At Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:14:19 -0700 (PDT), "'Joel Dueck' via Racket Users" wrote:
> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 9:01:51 AM UTC-5, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> > > Lingering elsewhere: the relicensing project that commenced more than
> > > 2.5 years ago [5] — not clear whether under the SFC this
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Kevin Forchione wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> I’ve been working for a little while with the idea of being able to pass
> keyword arguments through a function that doesn’t define them. Additionally I
> wanted to allow the “pass-through” function to define its own
Hi guys,
I’ve been working for a little while with the idea of being able to pass
keyword arguments through a function that doesn’t define them. Additionally I
wanted to allow the “pass-through” function to define its own keywords.
Additionally didn’t want to have to pre-specify what function
Robby Findler writes:
> Of course, it is good to make it easy to move to new versions of the
> language, but if there is no real benefit to the transition for the
> programmer (eg they aren't planning to touch that code for the next N
> months anyway as it does its job well) then I think we
11 matches
Mail list logo
