Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket News - Issue 4

2019-03-19 Thread 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users
On 18/03/2019 14:55, Jérôme Martin wrote: > Thank you so much for this! > Opened this for you: https://github.com/racket-news/racket-news.github.io-src/issues/12 Feel free to add to it if something else comes to mind. > If I can suggest a project for next month's spotlight: > > -

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket News - Issue 4

2019-03-19 Thread Jérôme Martin
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 9:29:00 AM UTC+1, Paulo Matos wrote: > Sure! That's great. I will add it to the submissions for issue 5 or 6. > Thanks! > I can obviously have one more section but the reason I would prefer not > to is because at about ~26 issues per year, I would like to have

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket News - Issue 4

2019-03-19 Thread 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users
On 18/03/2019 16:51, Matt Jadud wrote: > I'd be willing to pitch in some text around the thinking about the 'tbl' > library for introductory data work, so that people might push back on > it. Or, it would at least give a coherent surface for some conversation > around collaboration. > > If not

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket News - Issue 4

2019-03-19 Thread 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users
Hi Jerome, Thanks for all the suggestions. On 18/03/2019 14:55, Jérôme Martin wrote: > Thank you so much for this! > > If I can suggest a project for next month's spotlight: > > - Christopher Lemmer Webber, co-editor of the ActivityPub specs, is > working on a distributed social network

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket News - Issue 4

2019-03-18 Thread Matt Jadud
I'd be willing to pitch in some text around the thinking about the 'tbl' library for introductory data work, so that people might push back on it. Or, it would at least give a coherent surface for some conversation around collaboration. If not next issue, at some point. Or, not. I'm flexible. It