Re: [racket-users] SWIG

2017-09-14 Thread James
On Sep 14, 2017, at 3:13 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote: > I have a library for uPNP and NAT-PMP: > https://github.com/tonyg/racket-nat-traversal. It's not on the package > server for lack of round tuits, but it might be of interest. Certainly a > lot nicer not to have to go for an FFI when a

Re: [racket-users] SWIG

2017-09-14 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Tony Garnock-Jones wrote on 09/14/2017 03:13 PM: Certainly a lot nicer not to have to go for an FFI when a Racket library might be able to do the job. Tony, doing this in pure Racket is great, and an example to the rest of us (that one can work through some networking trickiness in pure

Re: [racket-users] SWIG

2017-09-14 Thread Tony Garnock-Jones
I have a library for uPNP and NAT-PMP: https://github.com/tonyg/racket-nat-traversal. It's not on the package server for lack of round tuits, but it might be of interest. Certainly a lot nicer not to have to go for an FFI when a Racket library might be able to do the job. Cheers, Tony On