Re: [racket-users] Thank you Racket!

2018-08-24 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 07:50:26AM -0700, Sanjeev Sharma wrote: > "Turing is useless" ... > > While I worked as a programmer I used to complain quite bitterly about > university comp sci departments that had NIH (not invented here) syndrome > and a captive audience. > > I learned Turing as

Re: [racket-users] Thank you Racket!

2018-08-24 Thread Sanjeev Sharma
I didn't realize (though I should have) that the comment could be taken that way. I realize you were not writing anything about the Turing language, but the title of the essay triggered some memories for me of what my classmates and later my professional colleagues used to talk about. And

Re: [racket-users] Thank you Racket!

2018-08-24 Thread Matthias Felleisen
For everyone else, the essay is NOT about Turing/the language or Turing/the man but Turing, the concept. And because it is true that we have monopoly power over students here, not a single required course forces students to use Racket. In our freshman course we use the teaching languages,

Re: [racket-users] Thank you Racket!

2018-08-24 Thread Sanjeev Sharma
"Turing is useless" ... While I worked as a programmer I used to complain quite bitterly about university comp sci departments that had NIH (not invented here) syndrome and a captive audience. I learned Turing as my 2nd programming language. I'm sure the only reason it could have been

Re: [racket-users] Thank you Racket!

2018-08-24 Thread Matthias Felleisen
> On Aug 24, 2018, at 5:50 AM, Jérôme Martin > wrote: > > I just read the article by Matt that was posted on Hacker News > (http://felleisen.org/matthias/OnHtDP/index.html) and I wanted to take the > time to thank you all in the PLT/Racket team. > > Thank you for trying (and achieving!) to