Re: [racket-users] Which html-parsing package?

2016-02-24 Thread Neil Van Dyke
BTW, the `html-parsing` package in the new package system is now my official one. (i'm in the middle of moving ~25 packages from PLaneT, and am tracking the status at "http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/;.) Neil V. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [racket-users] Which html-parsing package?

2016-02-24 Thread Brian Adkins
On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 11:46:17 AM UTC-5, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > BTW, I now intend to move my packages to the new package system shortly, > and I'll then stop supporting the PLaneT ones. > > (There's some urgency to moving now, so I'm going to punt on workarounds > for the

Re: [racket-users] Which html-parsing package?

2016-02-19 Thread Neil Van Dyke
BTW, I now intend to move my packages to the new package system shortly, and I'll then stop supporting the PLaneT ones. (There's some urgency to moving now, so I'm going to punt on workarounds for the version-related differences in the new package system, and cut some corners on automation

Re: [racket-users] Which html-parsing package?

2016-02-17 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Sounds like the mysterious "we" are forking development, so could you please mention at the top of the documentation that it's a fork of my package, not maintained by me, and cite my original one? The ways I manage my open source contributions are often very intentional, and unfortunately

Re: [racket-users] Which html-parsing package?

2016-02-17 Thread Jay McCarthy
I recommend using the one on the package server (pkgs.racket-lang.org). It integrates more smoothly with the rest of Racket libraries. While it is out of date, there are not significant changes in the 3.0 version: "Numeric character entities now parse to Racket strings instead of Racket

Re: [racket-users] Which html-parsing package?

2016-02-17 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Brian Adkins wrote on 02/17/2016 10:35 AM: 1) May I suggest we remove the out of date html-parsing package from the main package catalog? Had I not had the hiccup with the catalog server, I likely would've installed the out of date package and not realize what I'd done. I understand, but

Re: [racket-users] Which html-parsing package?

2016-02-17 Thread Ryan Culpepper
On 02/17/2016 10:39 AM, Brian Adkins wrote: On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 10:35:44 AM UTC-5, Brian Adkins wrote: On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 10:20:21 AM UTC-5, Neil Van Dyke wrote: Brian Adkins wrote on 02/17/2016 10:04 AM: http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket-html-parsing/ takes me

Re: [racket-users] Which html-parsing package?

2016-02-17 Thread Brian Adkins
On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 10:35:44 AM UTC-5, Brian Adkins wrote: > On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 10:20:21 AM UTC-5, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > > Brian Adkins wrote on 02/17/2016 10:04 AM: > > > http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket-html-parsing/ > > > > > > takes me to Neil's page with a

Re: [racket-users] Which html-parsing package?

2016-02-17 Thread Brian Adkins
On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 10:20:21 AM UTC-5, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > Brian Adkins wrote on 02/17/2016 10:04 AM: > > http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket-html-parsing/ > > > > takes me to Neil's page with a more recent history: PLaneT 3:0 — 2015-04-24 > > and the following require: > > > >

Re: [racket-users] Which html-parsing package?

2016-02-17 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Brian Adkins wrote on 02/17/2016 10:04 AM: http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket-html-parsing/ takes me to Neil's page with a more recent history: PLaneT 3:0 — 2015-04-24 and the following require: (require (planet neil/html-parsing:3:0)) Which package do I want? You might prefer that one,