Jay,
I think its a good idea to make things unambiguous but taggs just
feels wrong. Why not reuse taglib from J2EE? They're basically the
same thing as our tags
Sent from my iPhone
On 25-Oct-08, at 5:56 AM, Jay Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The term tags is, of necessity, overloaded
Ok, you're right.
For me, r:if content exists? would not feel right, though.
Manuel
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Chris Parrish
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manuel Meurer wrote:
I think that there is a place for these tags and I'd love it if there
was
an easy way to use this to create both
Sorry. I didn't want to come across so preachy. I agree with you. It
bugs me too.
If, however, I ask myself whether it would bother a non-techy -- someone
who not only doesn't know xml but who's never even heard of it -- then
I'd bet nearly all would prefer something like:
r:if x = 0
Extension announcement: I updated an extension I wrote many months ago
to work with Radiant 0.6.9. It does just what you think: host multiple
separate websites on one Radiant instance. Similar to multi_site, but
everything--pages, snippets, and layouts--is separate and you can
specify which
Jay Levitt wrote:
I added Edmund Haselwanter's bug fix to my copy of the tags extension
(thanks for that fix!), and now I'm trying to display a tag_cloud. But
I get this error instead of a cloud:
PGError: ERROR: column meta_tags.id must appear in the GROUP BY clause
or be used in an
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Joe Van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Jim Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 18, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Joe Van Dyk wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Jim Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 17, 2008, at 10:04 PM, Joe Van Dyk
