Re: [Radiant] Radiant Browser Support -- Drop IE6?

2008-07-19 Thread Marty Haught
I vote we drop IE6 for the admin side. Cheers, Marty On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Chris Parrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ha! Radiant for Web-TV... > > -Chris > > Adam van den Hoven wrote: >> >> I say release without IE6 support and then create a "Legacy Admin UI" >> extension to add suppo

Re: [Radiant] Radiant Browser Support -- Drop IE6?

2008-07-19 Thread Chris Parrish
Ha! Radiant for Web-TV... -Chris Adam van den Hoven wrote: I say release without IE6 support and then create a "Legacy Admin UI" extension to add support for IE < 7, WebTV and other fringe user agents. Adam On 19-Jul-08, at 12:49 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote: I'm of the opinion that IE6 is going t

Re: [Radiant] [ANN] Ray extension

2008-07-19 Thread john muhl
One more tiny update to point out Ray no longer depends on wget for fallback, instead that functionality has been replaced using the standard Ruby HTTP library. Hopefully it will make Ray useful in a wider variety of environments. ___ Radiant maili

Re: [Radiant] Radiant Browser Support -- Drop IE6?

2008-07-19 Thread Adam van den Hoven
I say release without IE6 support and then create a "Legacy Admin UI" extension to add support for IE < 7, WebTV and other fringe user agents. Adam On 19-Jul-08, at 12:49 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote: I'm of the opinion that IE6 is going the way of the dinosaur. Unless your client absolutely need

Re: [Radiant] [ANN] Ray extension

2008-07-19 Thread john muhl
Just a note that Ray is no longer “sort of stupid about migrate/update tasks”. Now an effort is made to determine whether there are any tasks. If a `vendor/extensions/extension_name/lib/tasks/ extension_name_extension_tasks.rake` file is found, Ray takes a peek inside to determine whether th

Re: [Radiant] Radiant Browser Support -- Drop IE6?

2008-07-19 Thread Sean Cribbs
I'm of the opinion that IE6 is going the way of the dinosaur. Unless your client absolutely needs it, I would avoid bending over backwards for it. IE6 support on the front-end is a different story (alas you may need at least minimal support for it -- still has approximate 25% market share), b

[Radiant] Re: SnS extension

2008-07-19 Thread Andrew Gehring
I'm using 0.6.7 (latest) with all gems updated... It's a new project no other extensions were installed. Thanks, Andrew On 7/19/08, Chris Parrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What version of Radiant do you have installed? Is this version already > installed and you are adding SnS to it or are

Re: [Radiant] Radiant Browser Support -- Drop IE6?

2008-07-19 Thread Alex Wayne
I would dance a god damn jig. Seriously though, I think public sites still need to support IE6. But gated admin areas that have a small number of users, I think its fine to declare IE7 the minimum. And, if we're lucky, the rest of the internet will follow suit. -Alex http://beautifulpix

Re: [Radiant] SnS extension

2008-07-19 Thread Chris Parrish
What version of Radiant do you have installed? Is this version already installed and you are adding SnS to it or are you rolling out Radiant for the first time with SnS in place? -Chris Andrew Gehring wrote: After installing SnS, whenever I try to do a db:migrate (for other extensions), I ge

[Radiant] Radiant Browser Support -- Drop IE6?

2008-07-19 Thread Chris Parrish
I have a question for all the Radiant users out there... Would anyone be left out if Radiant failed to support IE 6? I am working on some UI/CSS improvements for Radiant which require hacks and workarounds to support this browser. It can be done but I'm not sure it's worth it. IE 8 is alrea