[Radiant] HTML4 Love
Ahoihoi all. Having a site that is written in HTML 4.01 strict I am coming across numerous problems in core and in various extensions that are hard-coded to output self closing tags a la XHTML, meta /br /img / etc etc. Now it is relatively easy enough to dive into the source code and remove the slash but I was wondering if, as a community, we could decide upon a certain standard Radiant configuration option that could be referenced by all the tag generating code in core andwould be honoured in the various extensions. Heck, I wouldn't even mind going through the extensions and doing the drudge work involved (It would also be nice if everyone could agree on a certain way of how the code should be written, should be a relatively simple matter, if statement, text variable, constant, whatever). cheers Jeff ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
Re: [Radiant] A few questions
On 03/03/2009, at 11:54 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote: It may go away in later versions (because of the coming page- attributes feature), but Radiant has the description and keywords fields in the meta area of the edit screen. In your layout, use r:meta / to emit both of those fields, or r:meta:description / and r:meta:keywords /. This is great. Just what I was looking for. Elle ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
Re: [Radiant] A few questions
On 04/03/2009, at 12:33 AM, Jim Gay wrote: if you are referring to http://github.com/saturnflyer/radiant-seo_help-extension/ It was written to provide if_meta/unless_meta tags, which the existing standard Radiant tags does not provide. The README says: You should consider using page parts for your page meta data. The tags involved in using pages parts are significantly more helpful and flexible than the tags to support the meta information. This is because I felt that the keywords and description fields could easily, and more adeptly be used when the content is added in page parts because the tags supporting those are significantly more flexible. In order to have if/unless tags in my layouts for the keywords/description, I needed to write this extension (and because a client already had info in those fields). Thank you for explaining this Jim. I was wondering... and this makes sense Elle ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
Re: [Radiant] Speed of Radiant on Dreamhost: Follow up
I've had good luck with Joyent. I've found there servers snappy. It's also cheap enough and I haven't had any problems running rails apps there. -- Steven On Mar 3, 2009, at 6:43 PM, MtnBiker wrote: Dreamhost responded that they had had problems, but thought they'd fixed them. 50 seconds to load my site. And I had to refile my support request. I didn't see any reply or follow-up. Time to move on. I'll be looking at recommendations for a good Rail host. This will be for a very low hits personal sites. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Speed-of-Radiant-on-Dreamhost-tp6729p22321355.html Sent from the Radiant - User (New) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
Re: [Radiant] Speed of Radiant on Dreamhost: Follow up
I second this opinion... Joyent uses Solaris or Linux (I way prefer Solaris), and xen, zfs, etc. They cater to the client very well. Excellent group of folks. Knowledgeable people too - course they are not there to hold your hand with radient ;) good luck, whatever you choose. Steven Southard wrote: I've had good luck with Joyent. I've found there servers snappy. It's also cheap enough and I haven't had any problems running rails apps there. -- Steven On Mar 3, 2009, at 6:43 PM, MtnBiker wrote: Dreamhost responded that they had had problems, but thought they'd fixed them. 50 seconds to load my site. And I had to refile my support request. I didn't see any reply or follow-up. Time to move on. I'll be looking at recommendations for a good Rail host. This will be for a very low hits personal sites. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Speed-of-Radiant-on-Dreamhost-tp6729p22321355.html Sent from the Radiant - User (New) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
