Re: [Radiant] Radiant performance

2010-01-05 Thread Christian Aust 
Hi Stefan,

wonderful hint, I found that both the NavigationTags and the Feedreader 
extensions were wasting time. After optimization, rendering time went down from 
2500-3000ms to 200-600ms per page. Not too bad... Regards,

Christian 

Am 04.01.2010 um 10:19 schrieb qutic development:

 You might check out Rack::Bug to get an idea why the rendering time is  
 that high:
 
 http://github.com/brynary/rack-bug
 
 Best regards
 Stefan

___
Radiant mailing list
Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

[Radiant] Radiant performance

2010-01-04 Thread Christian Aust 
Hi all,

I've set up my new website http://software-consultant.net/ using Radiant 0.8.1 
and a bunch of extensions. In particular, I use

* Archive
* Feed-Reader
* Markdown
* Blog
* Nested layouts
* Paperclipped attachments
* Reorder
* Tags
* Thinking-Sphinx search
* Navigation tags
* Sitemap
* Filesystem Import/Export

For production, the site is running on a dual-core AMD server, 6GB RAM with a 
hardware RAID-1 under 64bit Ubuntu 8.0.4 LTS - pretty decent hosting for what 
is basically a low-profile site. However, it takes Apache2/Passenger several 
seconds (~2 seconds, sometimes up to 3) to fully render a page, and from the 
rails logs I assume that it's not Apache being responsible for the delay. From 
the current log:

 Processing SiteController#show_page (for 109.90.135.63 at 2010-01-04 
 08:58:57) [GET]
   Parameters: {action=show_page, url=[projekte, 
 redesign-webdynpro-java], controller=site}
 Completed in 1792ms (DB: 40) | 200 
 [http://software-consultant.net/projekte/redesign-webdynpro-java/]

My layout consists of a master template, a page template for most of the 
stuff and a project template inside page for URLs like the one mentioned 
above. No recursion involved. I've got ~50 pages and 8 snippets.

I suspect feedreader to connect to the RSS source for every request, which I 
will look into next. Removing the feedreader snippet from the layout doesn't 
show much improvement though, so what's taking Radiant so long?

I've got other rails applications on the very same setup that act quickly, so I 
guess it's not a general problem with my installation. Any comments? Your help 
is appreciated very much. Kind regards,

Christian
___
Radiant mailing list
Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Re: [Radiant] Radiant performance

2010-01-04 Thread qutic development 
You might check out Rack::Bug to get an idea why the rendering time is  
that high:

http://github.com/brynary/rack-bug

Best regards
Stefan

On 04.01.2010, at 09:06, Christian Aust wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've set up my new website http://software-consultant.net/ using  
 Radiant 0.8.1 and a bunch of extensions. In particular, I use

 * Archive
 * Feed-Reader
 * Markdown
 * Blog
 * Nested layouts
 * Paperclipped attachments
 * Reorder
 * Tags
 * Thinking-Sphinx search
 * Navigation tags
 * Sitemap
 * Filesystem Import/Export

 For production, the site is running on a dual-core AMD server, 6GB  
 RAM with a hardware RAID-1 under 64bit Ubuntu 8.0.4 LTS - pretty  
 decent hosting for what is basically a low-profile site. However, it  
 takes Apache2/Passenger several seconds (~2 seconds, sometimes up to  
 3) to fully render a page, and from the rails logs I assume that  
 it's not Apache being responsible for the delay. From the current log:

 Processing SiteController#show_page (for 109.90.135.63 at  
 2010-01-04 08:58:57) [GET]
  Parameters: {action=show_page, url=[projekte, redesign- 
 webdynpro-java], controller=site}
 Completed in 1792ms (DB: 40) | 200 
 [http://software-consultant.net/projekte/redesign-webdynpro-java/ 
 ]

 My layout consists of a master template, a page template for most  
 of the stuff and a project template inside page for URLs like  
 the one mentioned above. No recursion involved. I've got ~50 pages  
 and 8 snippets.

 I suspect feedreader to connect to the RSS source for every request,  
 which I will look into next. Removing the feedreader snippet from  
 the layout doesn't show much improvement though, so what's taking  
 Radiant so long?

 I've got other rails applications on the very same setup that act  
 quickly, so I guess it's not a general problem with my installation.  
 Any comments? Your help is appreciated very much. Kind regards,

 Christian
 ___
 Radiant mailing list
 Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
 Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
 Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

___
Radiant mailing list
Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant