[Radiant] Problem using children:each and the Dynamic Image extension

Hi! I'm experiencing some strange behavior using the children:each tag and the Dynamic Image extension (http://github.com/narced133/radiant-dynamic-image-extension) I have a page with, say, 3 subpages and implement the following code in the main page: r:children:each r:image size=13

[Radiant] Radiant settings extension: must be named settings

I had some trouble installing Alex's Settings extension. I had used it successfully before, but this time, I was getting the following errors: Could not load extension from file: radiant-settings_extension. #NameError: uninitialized constant RadiantSettingsExtension Finally, I realized that

Re: [Radiant] Radiant settings extension: must be named settings

Hi Jay Jay Levitt wrote: I had some trouble installing Alex's Settings extension. I had used it successfully before, but this time, I was getting the following errors: Could not load extension from file: radiant-settings_extension. #NameError: uninitialized constant RadiantSettingsExtension

[Radiant] Keeping your apps in SCM

I'm curious how many of you are keeping your Radiant apps in source control and deploying it to your server? I'm looking to convert my ancient radiant installs to such a solution but wanted to get some feedback on the experiences you've had doing this. Cheers, Marty

Re: [Radiant] Bootstrapping problem

Sean Cribbs wrote: [about the problem loading Page subclasses during bootstrap] http://github.com/radiant/radiant/commit/20d8f44d45f11a0e28231fdf86ded522ed927f6d This seems to have reappeared in 0.6.9; the above commit is still in place, but with PostgreSQL on Fedora Core 9, I'm getting: %

Re: [Radiant] Keeping your apps in SCM

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Marty Haught [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm curious how many of you are keeping your Radiant apps in source control and deploying it to your server? I'm looking to convert my ancient radiant installs to such a solution but wanted to get some feedback on the

Re: [Radiant] radiant-static-caching-extension

Christopher Dwan wrote: Hey, I just saw this on github! http://github.com/tricycle/radiant-static-caching-extension Has anyone used it? Is this 'production ready', i.e. safe to use? I haven't seen any discussion about it.. I'm missing something.. how does this differ from page caching?

[Radiant] Wacky version control idea for content

Just a thought I had in the shower: Most attempts at CMS version control end up reinventing large parts of subversion/git/etc. inside the database. Instead... Why not use something like FuseFS to implement a filesystem that maps the Radiant asset tree to paths like