Re: [Radiant] mailers, which one should I use?

2008-06-02 Thread danny q.
Hey Chris, That is pretty much what I was looking for before I used apache rules to do it. I really can't say how big a problem it is because I don't know how many people need to run production radiant on non-root urls, and I don't know how many of them are as green and part-time as me, and

Re: [Radiant] mailers, which one should I use?

2008-06-01 Thread Chris Parrish
Danny, I was hoping to include a fix for this issue with v0.4 but did not get to it yet. But, for now, you can already solve this issue using the config settings that I have built into the SnS extension (don't know why I didn't think of this sooner). To do this you edit the

Re: [Radiant] mailers, which one should I use?

2008-05-29 Thread Chris Parrish
Danny, Are you using my new Styles 'n Scripts extension. If so, I'm quite sure it isn't doing anything to accommodate a different root than plain old '/' and will happily break things for you. I would be happy to change this (for your need, to play nice with the multi_site extension, etc).

Re: [Radiant] mailers, which one should I use?

2008-05-29 Thread Sean Cribbs
Chris, I'll have a brief look at it today and let you know... but if you're using the standard Rails tools, it should just work. Sean Chris Parrish wrote: Danny, Are you using my new Styles 'n Scripts extension. If so, I'm quite sure it isn't doing anything to accommodate a different

Re: [Radiant] mailers, which one should I use?

2008-05-29 Thread danny q.
Yes I am using Styles 'n Scripts, and yes, I did notice most of this was fixed in 0.6.5, but IIRC, there were two problems I had to address for the relative link issue. First, with the old-fashioned script and style linking, each had to be set explicitly in the link tag. That is, I had to do