Re: [RADIATOR] NOT in match

I assume something like this should work? ?? -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net PGP: https://inoc.net/~rblayzor/ > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:45 PM, Hugh Irvine wrote: > > > Hello Robert - > > My personal preference is to only define positive

Re: [RADIATOR] Cannot process multiple AuthBy sections during authentication request

Thanks for the feedback, I have it working now with the EAP_MSCHAPv2_UseMultipleAuthBys workaround until I have implemented the convert method. I have 1 more question while I'm at it.. After using this UseMultipleAuthBys method, I get a different results than what I had on my old server. See

Re: [RADIATOR] NOT in match

Hello Robert - My personal preference is to only define positive matches in my Handlers, followed by a catch-all Handler for anything else. I find it much simpler to understand - YMMV. regards Hugh > On 5 Oct 2017, at 12:35, Robert Blayzor wrote: > > I know the

[RADIATOR] NOT in match

I know the following is possible.. But is it possible to do a “NOT” ie, something like: != seems to throw: Bad attribute=value pair: Service-Type != /Framed/ -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net PGP: https://inoc.net/~rblayzor/

Re: [RADIATOR] ClientListLDAP and mixed configuration.

On 3.10.2017 9.57, Johan Wassberg wrote: From the documentation about ClientListLDAP [0]: ``` [...] You can have some client details in your Radiator configuration file and some in although this can be confusing to future administrators. [...] ``` Hmm, probably should be 'clients' instead