Re: (RADIATOR) Microsoft Access problems

1999-07-19 Thread Mike McCauley
On Jul 19, 2:58pm, Arnie Roberts wrote: > Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Microsoft Access problems > On Monday, July 19, 1999 12:58 PM, Arnie Roberts [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 20, 1999 3:44 AM, Mike McCauley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > > Hi Arn

RE: (RADIATOR) Microsoft Access problems

1999-07-19 Thread Arnie Roberts
On Monday, July 19, 1999 12:58 PM, Arnie Roberts [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Tuesday, July 20, 1999 3:44 AM, Mike McCauley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > Hi Arnie, > > what is the data tpe of your TimeStamp column in Access? > > > > I have just been experimenting with an Access dat

RE: (RADIATOR) Microsoft Access problems

1999-07-19 Thread Arnie Roberts
On Tuesday, July 20, 1999 3:44 AM, Mike McCauley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Hi Arnie, > what is the data tpe of your TimeStamp column in Access? > > I have just been experimenting with an Access database where the Timestamp > column was a 'Number' (ie an int in SQL talk) with no problem .

RE: (RADIATOR) Microsoft Access problems

1999-07-19 Thread Arnie Roberts
On Sunday, July 18, 1999 1:36 AM, Aaron Miles [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Arnie, > Try no ' marks for the numbers as they are not needed, this > could be even if the output field is text. Try this anyway :-) > > > Cheers. > Aaron Aaron, Do you mean have

Re: (RADIATOR) Microsoft Access problems

1999-07-19 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Arnie, what is the data tpe of your TimeStamp column in Access? I have just been experimenting with an Access database where the Timestamp column was a 'Number' (ie an int in SQL talk) with no problem . Cheers. On Jul 19, 12:37pm, Arnie Roberts wrote: > Subject: RE: (RADIAT