-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Port-Limit is not the solution. Neither is Simultaneous-Usage.
I don't quite agree with you :-)
Port-Limit is a reply-list item. If the NAS is multilink aware it
should handle it.
The issue here is what happens when either the second
Hi Arturo -
Port-Limit is not the solution. Neither is Simultaneous-Usage.
I don't quite agree with you :-)
Port-Limit is a reply-list item. If the NAS is multilink aware it
should handle it.
The issue here is what happens when either the second (well in fact
not-the-first channel)
Hi
I think that every Nas that can give multilink PPP is bind to Port-Limit.
As for the Livingston(pm2-3) its does not care about Simultaneous Use at all, and
just count the port.
I wonder if livingston radius do it by SNMP or just remember the session in the
memory
Hugh Irvine wrote:
On
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
Hi
I think that every Nas that can give multilink PPP is bind to Port-Limit.
As for the Livingston(pm2-3) its does not care about Simultaneous Use at all, and
just count the port.
I wonder if livingston radius do it by SNMP or just remember the
So how othe Radius server do this ?
And what the livingston send that tell the Radius that its the second port of the
current Session ?
Hugh Irvine wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
Hi
I think that every Nas that can give multilink PPP is bind to Port-Limit.
As for the
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 04:56:11PM +0200, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
So how othe Radius server do this ?
And what the livingston send that tell the Radius that its the second port of the
current Session ?
It's not able to do this.
It can send Port-Limit = whatever
You can configure Radiator
Especially note that it only limits multilink ISDN sessions, it does not
prevent two separate non-multilinked logins. It doesn't not solve the
problem you face, you'll have to think of another way around it - static
IPs, caller id, multilink session ids (if your NAS sends them -
Cisco does).
But if ill put both set to 2 then i can easily have two users on 64k thats mean 1 less
customer.
I think the should be considered as bug.
any one know the email of the developing team ?
Hugh Irvine wrote:
Hello Michael -
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
In the Livingston Radius
On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 11:45:26AM +0200, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
But if ill put both set to 2 then i can easily have two users on 64k thats mean 1
less
customer.
I think the should be considered as bug.
any one know the email of the developing team ?
You might be able to do something with
Hello Michael -
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
But if ill put both set to 2 then i can easily have two users on 64k thats mean 1
less
customer.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean - if you have a customer using 128k,
that customer will use 2 x 64k channels. If you have a 30
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Arturo Pina wrote:
Hi,
Just to shed some light if I can...
Michael is meaning that it's not the same to have a single user using
2 channels than two separate users using a channel each one. This
way he would lose a customer for the price of a 128k dialup access
might
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, David Lloyd wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Arturo Pina wrote:
Hi,
Just to shed some light if I can...
Michael is meaning that it's not the same to have a single user using
2 channels than two separate users using a channel each one. This
way he would lose a
Yes its the easy way but:
i don't want 2 64k Users to connect.
Im selling the 128k as one unit non breakable.
Hugh Irvine wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
Hi All
If i put :
Port-Limit = 2 and
Simultaneous-Use = 1
can ISDN user connect in 128k ?
Normally you
In the Livingston Radius Manual Port-Limit is the controller of how many B channel
a user can use.
so i put in the replay attribute: Port-Limit = 2 and in the check attribute:
Simultaneous-Use = 1
and i get all the time when an ISDN user want to connect in 128k:
INFO: Access rejected for :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yup, yes, sí, oui :-)
Or at least it should ...
- --
Arturo Pina / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dpto. I+D / CTV-Jet (http://www.ctv-jet.com/)
Tfno: +34 96 5845291 / Fax: +34 96 5844896
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
Hi All
If i put :
Port-Limit = 2 and
Simultaneous-Use = 1
can ISDN user connect in 128k ?
Normally you would not use Port-Limit in this context, Port-Limit is for use in
allocating total numbers of ports to particular groups of users. I
16 matches
Mail list logo
