Oh, additionally, I don't think the 37signals company breaks
instantiated fixtures as with my patch we're only loading ActionPack
fixtures. Unless there are other ActionPack database fixtures I don't
know about, I think we're ok.
Kev
On 1/29/06, Kevin Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Accidental
> Why not have something like this:
>
> server: &server
> driver: /opt/local/whatever-driver.so # or whatever
> user: my_login
> password: M$_wh0r3
> server: 192.168.2.666
> tds_version: 8.0 # if anyone needs this
>
> development:
> database: rails_
After a quiet week some hidden spam has reappeared, using signatures
that I thought were being blocked:
and
Other people are catching most of the visible spam, but sometimes just
clear it out rather than rolling back to previous good content.
25th January 2006
-
HowToRe
On 1/29/06, Tom Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you can see, you can pass a full connection string as the dsn. I'd
> like to factor the common parameters out of this string (server, db,
> password, user) and use standard yaml
> attributes to specify them, but I need to check how this will aff
> > Unless people have significant objections, I'll create a ticket and
> > patch to deprecate ADO, and update the wiki instruction pages
> > accordingly.
>
> I don't really know enough about SQLServer to object. I know that I
> had to install the ADO driver to connect to one of my client's
> serve
Accidentally sent this just to Koz...
Also, I've been told that there is talk of refactoring Pagination all
together. I'm happy to take a shot at it. I tried to contact Sam on
IRC, but haven't received a response.
--
> In the meantime, I do have some questions about 3606. The use
> So what do people think? Does ADO have advantages over ODBC I'm not
> aware of? Are there other reasons to keep ADO support in the adapter?
>
> Unless people have significant objections, I'll create a ticket and
> patch to deprecate ADO, and update the wiki instruction pages
> accordingly.
I d
On 1/28/06, Kevin Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a patch ready adding the pagination tests (and confirming the
> bug with :include). It depends on ticket 3606
> (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3606) so I'll submit it as soon as
> 3606 is checked in.
> Kev
As the original author, Sa
On 1/29/06, John W. Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if something like this would make a good addition to the core:
>
> http://wiseheartdesign.com/articles/2006/01/28/test-helpers-for-rails
>
> It seems a useful and helpful convention.
Hi John,
I seem to remember seeing a PATCH ticket t