On 4-jun-2006, at 4:22, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> Yup, I'm not against doing away with proper patches. I'm against
> things like "It'd be nice if scriptaculous had a helper to make
a web
> 2.0 application for me".
Then I misunderstood the message completely. I am 200% on to wipe the
"magic
I'm *definitely* not suggesting that we get rid of patches which
implement new functionality. Quite the opposite, I simply think all
enhancement requests should be in the form of a patch. Trac isn't
the place for discussing new features, this list is. We should try
and keep trac to a list
> Yup, I'm not against doing away with proper patches. I'm against
> things like "It'd be nice if scriptaculous had a helper to make a web
> 2.0 application for me".
Then I misunderstood the message completely. I am 200% on to wipe the
"magic lantern" patches.
In hindsight, I communicated poorl
If you're overwhelmed with feature requests from a particular area, the
solution is not to force people to stop requesting. The solution is to use
Trac more effectively. Use filters, for christ sake! And it may be good idea
that some available Trac reports (
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/report) filt
"david" has given AR/Oracle some love, but it's still unhappy...
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/4430
r4430 | david | 2006-06-03 16:27:51 -0700 (Sat, 03 Jun 2006) | 1 line
Rolled back broken aliasing
---
"david" has kicked AR/Oracle while it was down...
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/4429
r4429 | david | 2006-06-03 15:43:13 -0700 (Sat, 03 Jun 2006) | 1 line
Fixed that Module#alias_method_chain should work with both foo
If you're overwhelmed with feature requests from a particular area, the solution is not to force people to stop requesting. The solution is to use Trac more effectively. Use filters, for christ sake! And it may be good idea that some available Trac reports (
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/report) filte
"david" has kicked AR/Oracle while it was down...
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/4419
r4419 | david | 2006-06-03 14:41:40 -0700 (Sat, 03 Jun 2006) | 1 line
Fixed migration trouble with SQLite when NOT NULL is used in t
On 3-jun-2006, at 20:45, Kevin Clark wrote:
Yup, I'm not against doing away with proper patches. I'm against
things like "It'd be nice if scriptaculous had a helper to make a web
2.0 application for me".
Then I misunderstood the message completely. I am 200% on to wipe the
"magic lantern" p
Yup, I'm not against doing away with proper patches. I'm against
things like "It'd be nice if scriptaculous had a helper to make a web
2.0 application for me". Patches certainly still have a place, and
essential functionality where the code fills a common need definitely
belongs in core. That bein
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 08:34:13PM +0200, Julian 'Julik' Tarkhanov wrote:
>
> On 3-jun-2006, at 19:47, Kevin Clark wrote:
>
> >>-1 because with this you are manifesting that Rails IS perfect and
> >>anyone who thinks the way it works should be upgraded has to either
> >>make workarounds or create
On 3-jun-2006, at 19:47, Kevin Clark wrote:
-1 because with this you are manifesting that Rails IS perfect and
anyone who thinks the way it works should be upgraded has to either
make workarounds or create exceptionally breakable plugins that
override code.
I disagree. The problem is that the
-1 because with this you are manifesting that Rails IS perfect and
anyone who thinks the way it works should be upgraded has to either
make workarounds or create exceptionally breakable plugins that
override code.
I disagree. The problem is that the trac has been the place to ask for
everything
On 3-jun-2006, at 5:00, Julian 'Julik' Tarkhanov wrote:
On 2-jun-2006, at 7:57, Jamis Buck wrote:
Hampton,
Thanks for your testing on this. It does appear that :id, at
least, is extra sticky now. We'll see what can be done with this,
since it should definitely not be acting so zealous.
On 3-jun-2006, at 5:17, Michael Koziarski wrote:
No More Enhancement Tickets.
Tickets in trac should either be:
1) Bug Report
2) Patch.
This will cut down the volume of submissions, and hopefully let us
focus on the good stuff that's coming in every day.
Thoughts?
-1 because with this you
15 matches
Mail list logo
