On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 08:34:13PM +0200, Julian 'Julik' Tarkhanov wrote: > > On 3-jun-2006, at 19:47, Kevin Clark wrote: > > >>-1 because with this you are manifesting that Rails IS perfect and > >>anyone who thinks the way it works should be upgraded has to either > >>make workarounds or create exceptionally breakable plugins that > >>override code. > > > >I disagree. The problem is that the trac has been the place to ask for > >everything under the sun . No one is going to get to your enhancement > >request unless you do it yourself > > I am speaking about enhancment tickets that have patches and test > coverage. Maybe you mean just generic "enhancement requests" (i.e. `I > want this and that` - without any code)? > > >Sure, discuss it on one of the lists and maybe someone will pick > >it up, but enhancement tickets are rarely taken on unless a developer > >has the same need. > > Which doesn't seem too nice to me. If the ticket is 20 lines, is > understandable and has test coverage - what is the problem?
This discussion of removing enhancements tickets never had anything to do with patches. A distinction is indeed being made between a ticket that says "I want this" with no associated patch and a ticket that has a patch. We have been discussing doing away with the former. marcel -- Marcel Molina Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
