Hi !
I get a failure for
RawPostDataTest#test_put_with_empty_content_type_ignores_body at
r4498:
2) Error:
test_put_with_empty_content_type_ignores_body(RawPostDataTest):
NoMethodError: undefined method `downcase' for nil:NilClass
./test/controller/../../lib/action_controller/cgi_ext/raw_po
Hi all,
I seem to have a problem. I attached a test case which I can't make
pass. The route was extracted verbatim from an existing application.
If I rollback in time to r4393, the tests pass.
The route is:
map.game_instructions 'game/:game/instructions', :controller => 'games',
:action =>
I lost even the most basic automatic routing support for the
module/:controller/:action/:id URL format going from 1.1.2 to 1.1.3. I
had to lock all my apps back to 1.1.2. Is my issue the same issue as
Francois?
Actual data but .com names have been changed to protect the innocent:
--- route.
This has been like this for quite some time now on Win32. The problem is that, when you save an empty string into an ENV variable, it is later returned as nil. Since the whole core team is on OS X they don't experience this and therefore it was never fixed.
4 weeks ago I submitted a patch for this
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Mislav Marohni?? wrote:
>This has been like this for quite some time now on Win32. The problem is
>that, when you save an empty string into an ENV variable, it is later
>returned as nil. Since the whole core team is on OS X they don't
>exper
Francois,
I suspect the problem is that the :game regex has \A and \Z in it.
Because the new routes put that verbatim into the larger route regex,
the match will fail. (Ditto for the /^.*$/ regex, with the ^ and $
anchors.) I *think* (Nicholas, correct me if I'm wrong) that you can
just t
2006/6/28, Jamis Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Francois,
I suspect the problem is that the :game regex has \A and \Z in it.
Because the new routes put that verbatim into the larger route regex,
the match will fail. (Ditto for the /^.*$/ regex, with the ^ and $
anchors.) I *think* (Nicholas, correct
I love the simply_restful plugin (beautiful work Jamis) but wonder why
the naming convention changed to look for pluralized controllers by
default.
If you do:
map.resource :message
then you must have a MessagesController.
If you already have a MessageController you need:
map.resource :message,
Howdy all,
I just installed 1.1.3, and all of a sudden my modularized controller
doesn't have a valid route. Admin::NewsController used to be mapped by
default in 1.1.2, but 1.1.3 doesn't find it.
The problem appears to be in
ActionController::Routing::ControllerComponent#traverse_to_controller,
Thanks for the bug report. This has been fixed in [4501].Sorry for the breakage,Nicholas SeckarOn 6/28/06, Coda Hale <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Howdy all,I just installed 1.1.3, and all of a sudden my modularized controller
doesn't have a valid route. Admin::NewsController used to be mapped bydefau
Ah ha !
2006/6/28, Jamis Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I suspect the problem is that the :game regex has \A and \Z in it.
Because the new routes put that verbatim into the larger route regex,
the match will fail. (Ditto for the /^.*$/ regex, with the ^ and $
anchors.) I *think* (Nicholas, correct me
On 6/28/06, Francois Beausoleil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,The route is:map.game_instructions 'game/:game/instructions', :controller => 'games',:action ="" 'instructions', :requirements => {:game => /\A[-\w \+%]+\Z/i}
Placing ^, \A, \Z, and $ inside regexp captures for requirements is no
Hello Jean-François,
2006/6/28, Jean-François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
By the way, isn't \A \z better than \A \Z ?
Actually, you might be right, except in this case it doesn't matter.
From "Programming Ruby" 2nd edition, p. 70, section Anchors:
"""The sequence \A matches the beginning of a string
On Jun 28, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Zack Chandler wrote:
I love the simply_restful plugin (beautiful work Jamis) but wonder why
the naming convention changed to look for pluralized controllers by
default.
If you do:
map.resource :message
then you must have a MessagesController.
If you already have a
Hello Nicholas !
2006/6/28, Nicholas Seckar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Perhaps we should add an informative error message for this case. Feel free
to weight in if you think so. (Or better yet, send a diff + unit test.)
I will, I only need a pointer on where I should start searching. With
that, I'll
On 6/28/06, Francois Beausoleil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Nicholas !2006/6/28, Nicholas Seckar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> Perhaps we should add an informative error message for this case. Feel free> to weight in if you think so. (Or better yet, send a diff + unit test.)
I will, I only need a poin
Zack,
The pluralization is intentional. This is because of the collection-
oriented nature of resources. If you have a "message" resource, you
get the collection of all messages at "/messages", and a single
message at "/messages/2". The controller itself manages
"messages" (serves up eithe
On 6/27/06, Nick Sieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/27/06, Nick Sieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Already done -- new patch applied.Whoops! s/applied/attached/ :)s/attached/applied/
:-)
___
Rails-core mailing list
Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org
ht
On 6/28/06, Nicholas Seckar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
s/attached/applied/
:-)
Thanks Nicholas!
___
Rails-core mailing list
Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
Excellent, thank you! Does this automatically mean it will be in 1.1.4?On 6/28/06, Nicholas Seckar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On 6/27/06, Nick Sieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/27/06, Nick Sieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Already done -- new patch applied.
Whoops! s/applied/attached/ :)s/
Jeremy, Jamis,
Thanks for clarifying the intention behind this choice. I had
posted a similar question to a recent loudthinking post and the
response (see below) leads me to believe there may be a few more
changes ahead.
http://www.loudthinking.com/arc/000593.html>
Challenge by DHH on June 28,
FYI... whenever someone is in a committing mood, the following is a
small no-brainer (IMHO)
Cheers,
Obie
#5544: [PATCH] Add underscore_table_names option to ActiveRecord::Base
-+--
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner
I did this during RailsConf, while browsing the routing source:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5507
I showed it to Nicholas on IRC, and he wondered why it didn't just use
Pathname#cleanpath from the standard library, rather than reinventing
it.
That seemed like a good question to me, so I rewr
wtf? did I miss a previous discussion on this or something? That's an
ugly hack if I've ever seen one.
- obie
Changes (by bitsweat):
* resolution: => wontfix
* version: => 1.1.1
* status: new => closed
Comment:
Pass a block wrapping the default table name to {{{set_table_name}}}
{{{
class
24 matches
Mail list logo
