Hi,
anyone mind, if I copy the sources from code.google.com and
mojo.codehaus.org to the Apache repository?
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
On Feb 3, 2008 7:55 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> want to import history or just current?
I'd stick with current.
As for the software grant: I am no expert with that. Let's clarify
that first. I'll send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], ok?
Jochen
--
Look, that's why ther
On Feb 10, 2008 9:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looks like a software grant isn't necessary if everyone's covered by a
> CLA. so feel free to import.
Ok.
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sounds complex, i know. is it likely to be faster than java's regex?
I am sure, that you'd be able to get something that is faster than
java's regex. But I doubt that it will be maintainable. I'd vote for
sticki
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one major bit of functionality that is missing from RAT are detached
> license descriptors. this is basically some means for an outside
> document to contain license information for files which cannot contain
>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think that the import is should be finished sometime soon. so should
> probably think about the best layout once it's done.
>
> opinions?
trunk - branches - tags, as always. :-) Everything else can be changed
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RAT generate XML under the hood and then creates it's plain text reports
> from it using XSLT. providing that we fixed a schema then improved
> reports (eg html) could easily be generated.
>
> any volunteers wh
Hi,
in order to integrate the maven plugins into the main sources, I would
like to break up the current sources into components. As a start, I
would propose the following components:
- Core
- Ant Tasks
- Maven 2 Plugin
In the future, there might also be a set of plugins. As Robert has
already po
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-14 still needed for the
> maven plugin?
Sure.
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my preferred approach to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-20 is
> to switch to pluggable MIME typing. IIRC TIKA has better support for
> MIME typing than RAT so i think factoring out the MIME magic makes
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it correct to say that mvn reports that want the
> former (default GeneratedLicenseNotRequired) are
> blocked on the latter (repackaging the plugin)?
I must admit that I haven't got any clue what you are asking, although
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I'll try to say it another way. :) I'm running
> RAT reports via mvn and want JavaCC-generated files to
> be ignored. What is the status of plugin releases?
> i.e., is there a release that contains the change from
>
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't find any documentation on that parameter, or
> any other really, at
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/index.html .
> Is there somewhere else I should be looking?
How about clicking on "goals" and next o
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> I'd like to include a RAT run in a Maven build process. What's the
> best way to do that?
Use the rat-maven-plugin.
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true because I can
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> The latest I can find is
> org.codehaus.mojo:rat-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-3 from 2007. Is there a
> more recent release available?
No.
> How do I configure the plugin?
http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/
--
I have always wished f
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> I was thinking of setting a CI build that automatically checks the
> license headers and fails if they are not correct. The documentation
> seems to suggest that this not possible at the moment. Are there plans
> to implement something like
Hi,
Jukkas various mails and issues from this week have reminded me, that
there are still only Google and Codehaus releases from the RAT
libraries and the Maven plugin. I think, we should change this.
Therefore, I propose that we cut a release 0.6 of both as soon as
possible. I'd offer to do the
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> the maven plugin still depends on the google version of the code. i'm
> willing to port to the new codebase if that sounds like a good idea to
> everyone.
If so, I did something wrong ... :-) I'll fix it later on.
--
I have alw
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>> the maven plugin still depends on the google version of the code. i'm
>> willing to port to the new codebase if that sounds like a good idea
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> before anyone asks, i think the ant task is just a little broken ATM.
> think it's just some classpath issues with the maven build but - unless
> anyone gets to it before me - i'll try to find some time to fix them.
IC ... the test
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> IIRC i did that intentionally (not sure why, though)
I'd discourage it. It's the reason why I didn't even notice.
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true becaus
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> i had some hard disc issues but everything seems like it's working again
> now.
>
> how about pushing towards a release...?
What's been blocking me lately, has been the trouble with the Antunit
tests. If that is fixed, 'd be ready.
Hi,
I have reworked the docs of the apache-rat-plugin today. Seemed to me
to be a prerequisite for 0.6. I have also moved several slow plugins
to the release profile. This means, that they aren't invoked usually,
unless you use the "-Prelease" parameter when invoking Maven. (Which
you need to do a
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> RAT is expected to report this month.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2009
Done.
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out
how to use
Hi,
I have prepared a staging repository for 0.6, which you can view on
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-4fdaf205188c41/
Compared to Roberts previous rc1, I have mainly changed documentation
and license issues (seems we never used RAT to check the RAT sources
... ;-)
P
Hi,
as you have probably noticed, I have created a new branch for
experimenting with RAT. The reason for creating a branch was that I
found RAT's way of emitting output plainly confusing, at least to me.
I never fully understood the system with "subject", "predicate", and
"object". In particular,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> one worry i had about non-streaming approaches is that they're not easy
> to use with big data sets (for example, scanning all the source in the
> incubator) since all the data needs to be in before the report can be
> produced
I b
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> i think that it would be useful to list the documents with unsupported
> licenses when the maven plugin fails a build
>
> opinions?
If it's a reason to defer 0.6, I'd be -1. If there are other reasons
for deferring, sure.
--
I ha
Hi,
as you have possibly noticed, Kevan Miller has found some legal issues
in 0.6rc2, which we need to fix. More precisely, it seems that the
NOTICE files in the apache-rat jar files are wrong. Is it fine, if I
disable building these jar files for now? They are redundant anyways.
Thanks,
Jochen
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Personally I much prefer keeping the .txt suffixes. It makes life
> easier on Windows.
Agreed, but the effect is that we end with both NOTICE and NOTICE.txt
files sometimes, the former generated by the remote-resources-plugin,
the latter ad
Hi,
I have prepared a new staging repository, which you can find on
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-51670640d59ff2/
The proposed binary and source files are in the subdirectory
org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.6/
The SVN tag is at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/as
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> where are we with this?
>
> are we cutting another release candidate or shall i take a look this one?
The only problem pointed out so far was the invalid year in the copyright. See
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--VOTE--apache-rat-pr
Passed with three binding +1 (Robert, Stefan, Kevan) , and two
non-binding (Sebb and myself). No other votes have been issued. I'll
publish the release and post a formal announcement.
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true beca
Hi, Stefan,
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Any objections against removing references to Nestable in RAT's trunk?
> Should I wait for a final 0.6 release?
go on, 0.6 is out. I just need to catch on with the formal announcement.
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my
The Apache RAT team is proud to announce the availability of Apache RAT 0.6.
RAT (Release Audit Tool) is a tool, which is designed to verify the
compliance with legal policies. A typical use case would be the
presence of license headers in ASF projects.
RAT was initially developed as a Google pro
I do not know whether this might attract interest. Main problem should
be the question where to host such a service.
Jochen
2009/4/15 Marija Šljivović :
> Hi to all!
>
> Looking at this idea which is interesting funcionality for RAT ( and it is
> not difficult for implementation)
> I was thinkin
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> is there any realistic way to use the new plugin in an apache project?
What's the problem, in your opinion? Within Maven, groupId = org.apache.rat,
artifactId=apache-rat-plugin, version=0.6, should do the trick. If it
doesn't, that'
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> as everyone who's subscribed to the commit records can probably tell,
> i've started to try to tidy up and simplify the rat code base.
>
> i know that the old code base is difficult to understand. it's crufty
> with quite a lot of ha
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> the current pipeline is very fine with claims pushing up individually,
> with potentially many claims for each subject. i think it'd probably be
> easier to understand if the pipeline were courser, with each resource
> collecting cl
As rat is basically a build time tool, as opposed to runtime, I think
there are no reasons to stick with 1.4.
Jochen
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
>
> Java 1.4 is now deprecated and rat-0.6 works on that platform
>
> any objections to moving to 1.5?
>
> - robert
Fine with me, in particular because this means that we don't need to
add CLI specific dependencies to the core.
Jochen
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Robert Burrell
Donkin wrote:
> retaining the command line interface in core will mean that either core
> will need to depend on every module use
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Gavin wrote:
> I'm assuming as the devs (Jochen etc) are here now, it means that the
> Codehaus version is now defunct?
Right.
--
Base64 decoding, 300% faster than sun.misc.BASE64Decoder:
http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=commons-dev&a=2008-05&t=7522166
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> who wants to be RM ?
>
> Personally I'd prefer it if anybody more Maven savvy than myself could
> take the driver's seat here.
Being the one who released 0.6, I can jump in here.
Jochen
--
Germanys national anthem is the most boring in
The RAT repository might certainly a place to go.
But, beg your pardon, what's so "heavy-weight" with RAT? I can't see
any advantages of a Python implementation, other than it would be
preferrable to Python developers.
Jochen
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> Last week
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-057/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
The proposed site is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/rat/site/
The list
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7 rc3.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-005/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
The proposed site and the KEYS file are here:
http://people.apache.org/~jochen
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:14 AM, sebb wrote:
> Where is the SVN tag?
Where maven-release-plugin creates it:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/tags/apache-rat-project-0.7/
--
Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7 rc4.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-051/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
The proposed site and the KEYS file are here:
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/r
Reminder: We need 3 votes.
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-07-30, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
>> I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7 rc4.
>
>> The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
>
>>
>&
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Even though Ant still lives in Java 1.4 land, there wouldn't be any
> problem with an Antlib that required Java 5 - Maven 2.2 requires Java5
> by now. I don't really think we are sticking with Java 1.4 for any real
> reason other than "nob
Is Gav a committer? Otherwise, we are still waiting for the third
positive vote? :-(
Jochen
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Gav... wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, 31 July 201
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Gav... wrote:
> I was voted in back in December last year.
Ok, thanks very much, in that case I'll procede to gene...@incubator.
Jochen
--
Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!
Hi,
the RAT developer team would like your approvement for a release of
Apache RAT 0.7.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-051/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
The proposed site and the KEYS file are here:
ht
Passed with 5* +1 (Kevan Miller, Senaka Fernando, Ant Elder, Stefan
Bodewig, Gavin McDonald), and no =0, or -1 votes. I'll proceed with
publishing the files.
Jochen
--
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
Hi,
on behalf of the Apache RAT team, I'd like to announce the
availability of Apache RAT 0.7. This is a feature release with several
bug fixes and minor improvements over its predecessor, Apache RAT 0.6.
An upgrade is recommended. For details on Apache RAT, see
http://incubator.apache.org/rat
Hi,
having just published a release of Apache RAT with the "-incubating"
label, I'd though it is time to discuss the future of RAT. RAT is an
incubator project since 18 months. It is not an overly busy project:
The occasional feature request, which is handled, a bug report from
time to time, and s
Forgot one possible issue: Currently, RAT has its own mailing lists,
which would be unusual for Commons. My personal choice would be to
leave this as it is, but that's of course also subject to discussion.
Jochen
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
&g
Hi, Nicolas,
sadly, but there is no documentation.
To include RAT into a CI build, you have to use either of the three
frontends for running RAT. See
http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
for how to do that.
Jochen
2010/8/11 Nicolas Lalevée :
> I would like to use RAT for IvyDE, Jan started t
Hi,
now that the waves are flattened again, the first thing I should
probably do is to apologize: Had I anticipated the multitude of
reactions, I'd have put my question to this mailing list, rather than
to several. However, I expected no more than 2 or 3 replies, that's
why the broad audience seem
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> So where is RAT going with respect to functionality. Is it really "complete"
> in it's current form, as some people have suggested?
>
> Don't get me wrong, it's a great tool for a very limited use case (I do use
> it outside the ASF), but
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> It's called Release Audit Tool and the original proposal was quite broad in
> scope.
I'm a plain stupid developer who has used RAT since quite some time
without additional ambitions. Tell me what you'd expect, not what's
written in a propos
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> So for now I'd rather keep the question simple:
>
> "Is it done?"
And that's exactly the question I cannot answer. You seem to have a
bigger vision for what RAT *could* do. And I cannot share that vision,
because I have no idea what that mig
I have to admit, it isn't.
However, I see this as a very important addition. If RAT ever wants to
be useful outside the ASF, then this needs to be done:
- Licenses (instances of org.apache.rat.analysis.IHeaderMatcher) must
be pluggable.
- For simple cases it should not be required to write a Java
Oh, about the @since question: For simple cases (@since required in
the global Javadoc section), RAT could be used. But my guess is that
you'd like to check methods as well, in which case RAT is much too
simplistic.
Jochen
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
Give me a few days and nag me, if you don't here from me. Which one do
you need first: Ant, Maven, or CLI?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> What you said all makes sense. This is a killer feature
>
>> Are you interested to give this a try?
>
> Yes, but I have no cyc
Hi, Christian,
took more than a few days, but now we finally do support custom
license matchers with rat.
See
http://ci.apache.org/projects/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html
for details, but in short you must have something like the following
in your POM:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> TLP? Opinions?
>
> And how close is Rat to being able to graduate?
My personal view remains that Rat is too small for a TLP and would be
far better off as a subproject of commons, or whatever might make
sense. If that were the case,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> I agree that the current code base is too small for a TLP but it's been
> hard to find anywhere suitable. Maybe we need to think now about
> creating a suitable TLP for this code base and other similar stuff.
Inventing such a TLP, w
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> I think that there is a space for small libraries shared by different
> build systems, potentially coded in different languages. I hope that
> some of the the other homes suggested (Maven, Ant, Ivy, Commons and
> Infrastructure) mig
Hi, Stefan,
I don't think the antlib has the same support for custom license
matchers than the Maven plugin does. However, I never came to
implementing that because I intended to discuss the implementation
with an expert like you.
What the Maven plugin supports, is something like that
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> classname="com.foo.MyCustomLicenseMatcher"/>
>
> and if the class uses Ant's conventions for setters and adders like say
>
> public void setUnknownProperty(int i) { }
>
>
Okay, in that case we should try hard to add some good ex
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> which docs? "new" matchers? ;-)
See the example regarding the SimplePatternBasedLicense on
http://incubator.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html
This is what the new stuff is all about.
Jochen
--
Cap
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> (Apologies for dropping the ball on this one: been recovering and rebuilding
> my development boxes)
Hi, Robert; when it comes to recovering, I fear to currently beating you. See
https://plus.google.com/109601534018793668119/posts/E
What problems are you having with a Maven site:You have several
options for the ource format, including apt and xdoc, and it's fairly
easy.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> I should really sit down and right up some user documentation...
>
> I've beaten Maven seve
I can't reproduce this with the current sources. Sorry!
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-07-20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> One of the Maven plugin tests is failing and it didn't fail on my
>> machine (I swear ;-).
>
>> It does now after I did a "mvn clean install"
Have to admit: I am unaware whether the problems with the Maven plugin
are solved or not...
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>et
> trunk holds some significant improvements in particular WRT support for
> more file formats when adding licenses, improved CLI handli
Let me know, if any of these issues must be solved WRT a release, if required.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-11-02, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
>> Have to admit: I am unaware whether the problems with the Maven plugin
>> are solved or not
> Can you use the plugin to create a report rather than run the check goal
> so you may see which files it is complaining about?
Ideally, create a small sample project and attach it to Jira. In that
case, we'll be able to resolv this quickly.
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the mos
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:23 PM, John W Vines wrote:
> 2. Ignore files by size - I saw in the website that with ant I could do a
> filter based on file size, but I couldn't find anything in the pom. Does this
> feature exist?
Is there a JIRA issue for that one?
Jochen
--
Capitalism is the
Hail the chair! (Glad he didn't insist in the "already chair" filter. :-)
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On 02/02/12 04:49, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-02-01, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:44 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>
>>
On 2012
Everything should be configured to publish those snapshots by just
running maven deploy. I did that once manually. There is no automatic
publication in place. Until then, this is mainly a good opportunity to
vaidate your deployment settings before deploying an actual release.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012
+1
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
> approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
>
> See [2] for a draft of the chart
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-8.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Applied, thank you!
> [PATCH] add JavaCC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-9.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Patch applied, thank you!
> A more informat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12596965#action_12596965
]
Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-19:
I think this is a non-issue. IMO, this should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-14?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597082#action_12597082
]
Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-14:
Ross, you are right: The *Maven Plugin* provides
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-37.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.6
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Applied, thank you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-36.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Applied, thank you!
> Report header incorrec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-35.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Applied, thank you!
> Incorrect number
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-33.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.6
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Fixed in the pom.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-29.
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
> NPE on "mvn install" in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-28?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-28.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Sorry for your wasted work, Jukka, but I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-42.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for your hints, David. AFAIK, your changes are now applied in the trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-41.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.6
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Applied, thank you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-44?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann closed RAT-44.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Changed in SVN and deployed to the Incubator web site
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-76.
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Resolution: Fixed
Done.
> allow auto-add headers from plu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-66.
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Resolution: Fixed
Added release.properties and pom.xml.releaseBackup
97 matches
Mail list logo
