On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sounds complex, i know. is it likely to be faster than java's regex?
I am sure, that you'd be able to get something that is faster than
java's regex. But I doubt that it will be maintainable. I'd vote for
sticking
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think that the import is should be finished sometime soon. so should
probably think about the best layout once it's done.
opinions?
trunk - branches - tags, as always. :-) Everything else can be changed
Hi,
I have reworked the docs of the apache-rat-plugin today. Seemed to me
to be a prerequisite for 0.6. I have also moved several slow plugins
to the release profile. This means, that they aren't invoked usually,
unless you use the -Prelease parameter when invoking Maven. (Which
you need to do
Hi,
as you have probably noticed, I have created a new branch for
experimenting with RAT. The reason for creating a branch was that I
found RAT's way of emitting output plainly confusing, at least to me.
I never fully understood the system with subject, predicate, and
object. In particular, it
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
one worry i had about non-streaming approaches is that they're not easy
to use with big data sets (for example, scanning all the source in the
incubator) since all the data needs to be in before
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
i think that it would be useful to list the documents with unsupported
licenses when the maven plugin fails a build
opinions?
If it's a reason to defer 0.6, I'd be -1. If there are other
Hi,
as you have possibly noticed, Kevan Miller has found some legal issues
in 0.6rc2, which we need to fix. More precisely, it seems that the
NOTICE files in the apache-rat jar files are wrong. Is it fine, if I
disable building these jar files for now? They are redundant anyways.
Thanks,
Jochen
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I much prefer keeping the .txt suffixes. It makes life
easier on Windows.
Agreed, but the effect is that we end with both NOTICE and NOTICE.txt
files sometimes, the former generated by the
Hi,
I have prepared a new staging repository, which you can find on
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-51670640d59ff2/
The proposed binary and source files are in the subdirectory
org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.6/
The SVN tag is at
Passed with three binding +1 (Robert, Stefan, Kevan) , and two
non-binding (Sebb and myself). No other votes have been issued. I'll
publish the release and post a formal announcement.
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true
Hi, Stefan,
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Any objections against removing references to Nestable in RAT's trunk?
Should I wait for a final 0.6 release?
go on, 0.6 is out. I just need to catch on with the formal announcement.
Jochen
--
I have
The Apache RAT team is proud to announce the availability of Apache RAT 0.6.
RAT (Release Audit Tool) is a tool, which is designed to verify the
compliance with legal policies. A typical use case would be the
presence of license headers in ASF projects.
RAT was initially developed as a Google
I do not know whether this might attract interest. Main problem should
be the question where to host such a service.
Jochen
2009/4/15 Marija Šljivović mak...@gmail.com:
Hi to all!
Looking at this idea which is interesting funcionality for RAT ( and it is
not difficult for implementation)
I
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
the current pipeline is very fine with claims pushing up individually,
with potentially many claims for each subject. i think it'd probably be
easier to understand if the pipeline were courser,
As rat is basically a build time tool, as opposed to runtime, I think
there are no reasons to stick with 1.4.
Jochen
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Java 1.4 is now deprecated and rat-0.6 works on that platform
any
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-057/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
The proposed site is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/rat/site/
The list
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7 rc3.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-005/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
The proposed site and the KEYS file are here:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:14 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is the SVN tag?
Where maven-release-plugin creates it:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/tags/apache-rat-project-0.7/
--
Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7 rc4.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-051/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
The proposed site and the KEYS file are here:
Reminder: We need 3 votes.
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-07-30, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7 rc4.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Even though Ant still lives in Java 1.4 land, there wouldn't be any
problem with an Antlib that required Java 5 - Maven 2.2 requires Java5
by now. I don't really think we are sticking with Java 1.4 for any real
reason
Is Gav a committer? Otherwise, we are still waiting for the third
positive vote? :-(
Jochen
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 31 July 2010 7:23 AM
Hi,
the RAT developer team would like your approvement for a release of
Apache RAT 0.7.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-051/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
The proposed site and the KEYS file are here:
Hi,
on behalf of the Apache RAT team, I'd like to announce the
availability of Apache RAT 0.7. This is a feature release with several
bug fixes and minor improvements over its predecessor, Apache RAT 0.6.
An upgrade is recommended. For details on Apache RAT, see
http://incubator.apache.org/rat
Hi,
having just published a release of Apache RAT with the -incubating
label, I'd though it is time to discuss the future of RAT. RAT is an
incubator project since 18 months. It is not an overly busy project:
The occasional feature request, which is handled, a bug report from
time to time, and so
Forgot one possible issue: Currently, RAT has its own mailing lists,
which would be unusual for Commons. My personal choice would be to
leave this as it is, but that's of course also subject to discussion.
Jochen
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote
Hi,
now that the waves are flattened again, the first thing I should
probably do is to apologize: Had I anticipated the multitude of
reactions, I'd have put my question to this mailing list, rather than
to several. However, I expected no more than 2 or 3 replies, that's
why the broad audience
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
So where is RAT going with respect to functionality. Is it really complete
in it's current form, as some people have suggested?
Don't get me wrong, it's a great tool for a very limited use case (I do use
it outside
I have to admit, it isn't.
However, I see this as a very important addition. If RAT ever wants to
be useful outside the ASF, then this needs to be done:
- Licenses (instances of org.apache.rat.analysis.IHeaderMatcher) must
be pluggable.
- For simple cases it should not be required to write a
Oh, about the @since question: For simple cases (@since required in
the global Javadoc section), RAT could be used. But my guess is that
you'd like to check methods as well, in which case RAT is much too
simplistic.
Jochen
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Christian Grobmeier
Give me a few days and nag me, if you don't here from me. Which one do
you need first: Ant, Maven, or CLI?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
What you said all makes sense. This is a killer feature
Are you interested to give this a try?
Yes, but
Hi, Christian,
took more than a few days, but now we finally do support custom
license matchers with rat.
See
http://ci.apache.org/projects/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html
for details, but in short you must have something like the following
in your POM:
licenses
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
rdon...@apache.org wrote:
TLP? Opinions?
And how close is Rat to being able to graduate?
My personal view remains that Rat is too small for a TLP and would be
far better off as a subproject of commons, or whatever might make
sense. If
Hi, Stefan,
I don't think the antlib has the same support for custom license
matchers than the Maven plugin does. However, I never came to
implementing that because I intended to discuss the implementation
with an expert like you.
What the Maven plugin supports, is something like that
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
typedef name=mymatcher
classname=com.foo.MyCustomLicenseMatcher/
and if the class uses Ant's conventions for setters and adders like say
public void setUnknownProperty(int i) { }
mymatcher
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
rdon...@apache.org wrote:
(Apologies for dropping the ball on this one: been recovering and rebuilding
my development boxes)
Hi, Robert; when it comes to recovering, I fear to currently beating you. See
Let me know, if any of these issues must be solved WRT a release, if required.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-11-02, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Have to admit: I am unaware whether the problems with the Maven plugin
are solved
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:23 PM, John W Vines john.w.vi...@ugov.gov wrote:
2. Ignore files by size - I saw in the website that with ant I could do a
filter based on file size, but I couldn't find anything in the pom. Does this
feature exist?
Is there a JIRA issue for that one?
Jochen
--
Everything should be configured to publish those snapshots by just
running maven deploy. I did that once manually. There is no automatic
publication in place. Until then, this is mainly a good opportunity to
vaidate your deployment settings before deploying an actual release.
On Sat, Feb 25,
+1
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
rdon...@apache.org wrote:
The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
See [2] for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-42.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for your hints, David. AFAIK, your changes are now applied in the trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-41.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.6
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Applied, thank you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-44?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann closed RAT-44.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Changed in SVN and deployed to the Incubator web site
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-66.
Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann
Resolution: Fixed
Added release.properties and pom.xml.releaseBackup
44 matches
Mail list logo
