Sorry for the newbie question but can anyone help me please. OSX server
running 10.3 with SpamAssassin, etc. When I look in the logs I see the
following error:
May 10 17:55:04 xserve spamd[24365]: razor2 check skipped: Insecure
dependency in connect while running setuid at
/System/Library/Per
At 11:33 AM 5/11/2004, Celso Maiolo wrote:
May 10 17:55:04 xserve spamd[24365]: razor2 check skipped: Insecure
dependency in connect while running setuid at
/System/Library/Perl/5.8.1/darwin-thread-multi-2level/IO/Socket.pm line
114, line 116.
Upgrade to razor 2.40, or apply the patch, as pe
Sorry for the newbie question but can anyone help me please. OSX server
running 10.3 with SpamAssassin, etc. When I look in the logs I see the
following error:
May 10 17:55:04 xserve spamd[24365]: razor2 check skipped: Insecure
dependency in connect while running setuid at
/System/Library/Per
28, 2004 4:55 PM
To: marcusv; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] help on configure.
At 08:40 AM 4/28/2004, marcusv wrote:
>Apr 28 11:40:47.942175 admin[13316]: [ 5] Finding Discovery Servers via
>DNS in the truth.cloudmark.com zone Apr 28 11:45:20.416011
>admin[13316]: [ 6
At 08:40 AM 4/28/2004, marcusv wrote:
Apr 28 11:40:47.942175 admin[13316]: [ 5] Finding Discovery Servers via
DNS in the truth.cloudmark.com zone Apr 28 11:45:20.416011 admin[13316]:
[ 6] Found 0 Discovery Servers via DNS in the truth.cloudmark.com zone
Apr 28 11:45:20.416593 admin[13316]: [ 1] raz
Hi there guys.
I'm am stuck and I have gone through just about every how-to available.
I'm trying to install.
postfix.
Amavisd.
Spamassassin.
Razor.
>From a how to
CREATING A SPAMFILTER RELAY SERVER
By Scott L. Henderson.
Now I'm at the section for razor to be configured.
razor-admin -d -crea
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:51:36AM +1100, Mark Edwards wrote:
> I am seeing the sdk tests fail and razor agents fail with the following error...
>
> Digest::SHA1 object version 2.01 does not match bootstrap parameter 2.06 at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/DynaLoader.pm line 249.
>
Hi.
just downloaded and installed razor-agents-sdk-2.03
and razor-agents-2.36
I am seeing the sdk tests fail and razor agents
fail with the following error...
blib/script/razor-clientDigest::SHA1 object
version 2.01 does not match bootstrap parameter 2.06 at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-l
- Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 3:40 PM
> Subject: RE: [Razor-users] Help! I'm getting over 20MB of Spa
fied Professional
I have an existential map; it has you are here written all over it.
- Steven Wright
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October
Bah Jeff. Think *then* post. You said mailscanner, not spamassassin.
Sorry. =)
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 14:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Um, the concept is correct - you'll be better off if you can block at
> the
> MTA level - but the implementation recommended doesn't do that.
> MailScanner
> on
I think MailScanner is great - I use it
> -
> but it doesn't work at the MTA level.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Youn Gonzales [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:02 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vipul's Ra
ent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vipul's Razor SPAM e-mail list
> Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Help! I'm getting over 20MB of Spam a day!
> {Scanned by HJMS}
>
>
> Block the messages at the MTA - ie before spamassassin is
> called or
Professional
I have an existential map; it has you are here written all over it.
- Steven Wright
- Original Message -
From: "Aurangzeb M. Agha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Vipul's Razor SPAM e-mail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 9:1
I'm at a point of desperation.
I'm getting over 20MB of Spam a day, all from what seems to be the same
entity. The headers of each e-mail are different, but look similar to
this:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web05.bigbiz.com (web05.bigbiz.com [216.218.198.5])
by cinema
boxes with this fix on them and haven't run into
a single problem with it yet...
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Razor-users] Hel
Very interesting...my reason for my reply is that there have been many
times thta people have tried installing the Razor agents without having
the prerequisite Perl modules in place...the razor-agents-sdk package
contains all the required Perl modules.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the reply, it was the agents I was trying to
install, Mark's answer solved it for me.
Cheers,
Howie
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:56:55 -0500 (EST), Mike Burger
wrote:
>
> Download, uncompress/untar, perl Makefile.PL, make,
> make test, make
> install.
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, M
Hi Zeb,
Thanks for the reply - was already running as root,
needed to change the language setting. See Mark's reply
for full details...
Cheers,
Howie
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:30:18 -0700 (PDT), "Aurangzeb M.
Agha" wrote:
>
> Howie -- Do you have root privelages on the machine
> you're installin
it works...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Razor-users] He
Download, uncompress/untar, perl Makefile.PL, make, make test, make
install.
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Mike Burger wrote:
> Did you install the razor-agents-sdk, first?
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm a linux newbie and am trying to install
> > razor-agents-s
Did you install the razor-agents-sdk, first?
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a linux newbie and am trying to install
> razor-agents-sdk-2.03 on a Redhat 8.0 box. All goes
> well until I run make test when I recieve the following
> error (I ran this as root)
>
>
> mak
Howie -- Do you have root privelages on the machine you're installing?
Are you installing as root? If not, try that.
Zeb
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Hi,
:
:I'm a linux newbie and am trying to install
:razor-agents-sdk-2.03 on a Redhat 8.0 box. All goes
:well until I ru
Hi,
I'm a linux newbie and am trying to install
razor-agents-sdk-2.03 on a Redhat 8.0 box. All goes
well until I run make test when I recieve the following
error (I ran this as root)
make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/razor-agents-sdk-2.03/Digest-MD5-2.20'
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/per
Title: Help on Razor 2 Install
I am doing the install for Razor v2. I was running V1 on my system prior to this install attempt.
I am running RedHat 7.2
I downloaded the agents and sdk per the INSTALL help.
It looks like the SDK ran perfert… with no problems.
The agent part
FYI, three messages I sent (with CC to myself) and one that was sent
to me were all flagged with "Listed in Razor1" for 2.6 points. And
none of them were spam, and none were anything like boilerplate.
Obviously the version of Razor I'm using has some bug that is causing
false positives.
I'll upg
Razor Client Tools 1.20, protocol version 2
Matt Kettler writes:
>you can manually run razor to find out what version it is:
>
>I have both razor1 and razor2 installed (with razor1's razor-check renamed
>to razor-check.v1 and so on), but I have razor1 disabled in my SpamAssassin
>config so I'm n
you can manually run razor to find out what version it is:
I have both razor1 and razor2 installed (with razor1's razor-check renamed
to razor-check.v1 and so on), but I have razor1 disabled in my SpamAssassin
config so I'm not using it anymore.
$ razor-check.v1 -v
Razor Client Tools 1.20, prot
Just install the latest v2 and be happy :)
William R Ward wrote:
Unfortunately I don't know what version of razor I have; I just know I
have SpamAssassin 2.43 installed.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Editio
That *is* odd. Well, if it happens again I'll let you know.
Unfortunately I don't know what version of razor I have; I just know I
have SpamAssassin 2.43 installed.
--Bill.
Matt Kettler writes:
>As someone else already said, razor1 computes the 160-bit SHA1 hash of the
>entire body and then as
As someone else already said, razor1 computes the 160-bit SHA1 hash of the
entire body and then asks the server if that hash is in the database.
For 2 emails to randomly have the same SHA1 hash is hugely
improbable (It's late but I think it's 1 in 2^160 * 2*160, or 1 in
2^320... That's 1 in 2
> Oh! I thought Razor was some kind of "realtime black list" type
> thing, based on the IP address of the sender and such. I'm surprised
> to hear that it looks at the body. (I don't use Razor directly; it's
> only relevant to me because I use SpamAssassin.)
>
> The body of my message was pretty
Michael Loftis writes:
>OK then lets take a look at the tags you hit on. Right away you notice
>FROM_AND_TO_SAME -- so there's 1.3 points your recievers probably won't
>get. A large portion of your message is in UPPERCASE. If you can reformat
>the message so that less of it is in uppercase yo
Oh! I thought Razor was some kind of "realtime black list" type
thing, based on the IP address of the sender and such. I'm surprised
to hear that it looks at the body. (I don't use Razor directly; it's
only relevant to me because I use SpamAssassin.)
The body of my message was pretty unique - i
Razor does not store, or operate based on what your email address is or who
your ISP is.
Razor does NOT have your email address, nor the servers of your ISP, in
some kind of blacklist.
Razor operates based on comparing hash results of the message body, it
doesn't even examine any of the header
OK then lets take a look at the tags you hit on. Right away you notice
FROM_AND_TO_SAME -- so there's 1.3 points your recievers probably won't
get. A large portion of your message is in UPPERCASE. If you can reformat
the message so that less of it is in uppercase you can pass that check.
The
My concern is that when I send mail to someone else, their spam filter
might block it...
Michael Loftis writes:
>Add your sending address to the whitelist_from.
>
>Razor just make a 'hash' of the message which is anonymous esp. in that you
>can get collisions like this one. Think of it as a real
Add your sending address to the whitelist_from.
Razor just make a 'hash' of the message which is anonymous esp. in that you
can get collisions like this one. Think of it as a really bad photocopy or
one of those government documents with all the really important stuff
blacked out. It's useful
I have a script I run from a cron job that emails myself with my
employer's stock quote at the end of each trading day. I was shocked
to find that today's e-mail is flagged by SpamAssassin as spam! This
is new - it has never been flagged as spam before.
The reason I'm posting to razor-users is
39 matches
Mail list logo
