On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 11:14:16AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I still need to publish my slides for both my r-b talks at DebConf24
> > and then the 2nd talk needs to be mentioned in the report as well. :)
> Ooh, good idea. I'll hold off on publishing until you can land those.
I've pushed my slid
Hi Chris,
thank you for writing these great monthly reports!
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 10:49:14AM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for August's Reproducible Builds report:
> https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-08/?draft
I still need to publish my slides for both my r-b
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 06:46:35AM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> > I'll note that fakeroot was probably broken on armel, armhf since
> > the t64 migration until mid-August.
> > Is fakeroot involved in any way? If so, it might make sense to
> > discard any results from that period.
> Thanks for
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:46:41PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> This conflicts with Linux Plumbers, and almost conflicts with Qubes OS
> Summit :(
we've been aware of this, however we couldn't really schedule it at a
different time. and sadly (though probably rather: gladly) there wi
Hi,
I'm very glad to be able to announce that we will be having
the Reproducible Builds summit in 2024 from September 17 to 19
in Hamburg, in the same venue we've been in 2023:
https://reproducible-builds.org/events/hamburg2024/
Again and as previously, the exact content of the meeting will be
Hi Roland,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:44:37PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote:
> I'm sooo close...
[...]
hehe, congrats & thanks for keeping us in the loop! In honor of your
work I've manually written the signature of this email...! :)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|re
Dear Bernhard.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:57:33PM +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann via rb-general
wrote:
> In https://github.com/bmwiedemann/theunreproduciblepackage/ I had collected
> the many issues that introduce non-determinism.
>
> Today it is time to talk about mitigations - how can we avoid w
Hi Justin,
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 12:55:46PM -0400, Justin Cappos wrote:
> I'd love to help host this in NYC. We can certainly provide space to meet
> and work.
that's an interesting offer! thank you!
> I'm not sure if cost / travel time would be prohibitive though.
true.
--
cheers,
hi,
I'm very happy to announce that this year we'll be holding the eighth
Reproducible Builds Summit!
The dates and location are not fixed yet, however if you don' help us
with finding a suitable location *soon*, it is very likely that we'll
meet again in Hamburg in the 2nd half of September 2024
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 08:36:05PM +0200, Simon Josefsson via rb-general wrote:
> > As of May 2024, I have imported source code data from the following
> > distributions:
> This is awesome!
indeed! thanks and kudos, kpcyrd, both for the code in the first place
as well as taking time & efford to an
Dear Chris et al,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:52:39PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report:
> This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
great, thank you and everyone involved indeed!
I also like the final order of the entri
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:02:56AM -0400, David A. Wheeler via rb-general wrote:
> I agree, this one is HUGE news. There's been a lot of awesome work related to
> reproducible builds, but "minimal container userland is a 100% reproducible
> build in a real-world widely-used distro" is a big step
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 08:45:03AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> >> Note: I confused myself when writing this; in fact Salsa-CI reprotest
> >> _does_
> >> continue to test build-path variance, at least until we decide otherwise.
> > this is in fact a bug and should be fixed with the next repro
hi,
from irc:
kpcyrd: may i quote on rb-general what you wrote here?
[11:56] < h01ger> kpcyrd: many thanks for your arch linux status
update! i just wonder: does archlinux re-build in the same path as the original
build or not? :)
[11:59] < kpcyrd> | h01ger: yes, the build path always st
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 06:24:22PM +, James Addison via rb-general wrote:
> Please find below a draft of the message I'll send to each affected bugreport.
looks good to me, thank you for doing this!
> Note: I confused myself when writing this; in fact Salsa-CI reprotest _does_
> continue to
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:51:16PM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> FWIW Yocto Project is a strong believer in build reproducibiity
> independent of build path and we've been quietly chipping away at those
> issues.
[...]
> OpenEmbedded-Core (around 1000 pieces of software) is 100% reproducible
> an
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:52:07AM -0800, John Gilmore wrote:
> Why would these become "wishlist" bugs as opposed to actual reproducibility
> bugs
> that deserve fixing, just because one server at Debian no longer invokes this
> bug because it always uses the same build directory?
because it's "n
Hi Bernhard,
(this got lost in post end of the year busyness...)
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 09:42:53AM +0100, Bernhard M. Wiedemann via rb-general
wrote:
> Sometimes people wonder:
> Why is not everything reproducible yet?
>
> And the general reason is that there are other interests that result in
Hi Fay,
On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 10:30:05PM +0100, Fay Stegerman wrote:
> Sadly, I've had to leave F-Droid. I will thus no longer be working on
> Android reproducible builds or update the monthly overview of F-Droid
> apps published with reproducible builds. AFAIK no one is planning to
> take ove
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 01:12:40PM +0100, наб wrote:
> If the scissors didn't give it away, this is a "proper" scissor-patch,
> which uses headers from the mail (herein: From:)
> and overrides under the cut line (herein: Subject:),
> but you do need -c or --scissors to apply it:
TIL, thanks.
--
hi,
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:42:25PM +0100, наб wrote:
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] jenkins.d.n: AddEncoding gzip .gz, such that the files aren't
> re-compressed as gzip, which some clients can't deal with, and it's a waste
> of time
>
> The current approach, under bookworm apache 2.4.57-2,
hi,
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 03:23:59PM +0100, наб wrote:
> > so good on linux and bad on windows?
> This is what I kept coming back to, but refused to accept firefox would
> do something this weird just based on the target.
>
> Forgot, of course, that both bad machines have ESET running,
> and di
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 02:14:31PM +0100, Julien Malka wrote:
> To whom it may concern, it looks like the
> https://reproducible-builds.org/ website is down.
thanks, it's back now.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:05:02PM +0100, наб wrote:
> Keep me in CC please.
ack, done.
> On opening
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/systemd-cron.html
> I see garbage in the log view
> (screenshot at https://101010.pl/@nabijaczleweli/111410835559109
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 04:28:42PM -0800, John Gilmore wrote:
> I do think the topic is a suitable one for the Reproducible Builds
> community to discuss. Politely conducted disputes should not be
> dismissed as "nonsense" with a suggestion that the parties unsubscribe
> from the list. Inflating
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 09:00:55AM +0100, aho...@0w.se wrote:
> I only react on it being *explicitly referred* in the announcements
> on *this list* time and time again
nobody forced you to subscribe to this list, nobody forces you
to reply (I hope), unsubscribing is easy.
> P.S. Calling somethi
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 09:16:38AM +0100, aho...@0w.se wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 07:38:42AM +0100, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > We are happy to announce the release of GNU Mes 0.25!
> Regrettably, the post includes a reference to [...]
an, stop this *now*. Your repeated hostile nonsens
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 11:02:47AM +0100, Pol Dellaiera wrote:
> I just pushed a commit to actually publish it, hope it's ok !
I've seen those two commits pass by on IRC and the fact that they
were not coming from Chris *and* included the words "report for November"
(albeit in the commit message
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 07:28:37PM +0100, Pol Dellaiera wrote:
> First, it is available in Nix:
> https://search.nixos.org/packages?channel=23.05&show=perl536Packages.strip-nondeterminism&from=0&size=50&sort=relevance&type=packages&query=nondeterminism
>
> A quick text search of `strip-nondetermi
Hi Pol,
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 04:38:19PM +0100, Pol Dellaiera wrote:
> I'm writing to express my enthusiasm for the discussions and initiatives that
> took place during the meeting in Hamburg. Although I was regrettably unable
> to attend, I have been closely following the outcomes and I'm par
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 01:48:22PM +0100, Pol Dellaiera wrote:
> [...] it was strip-determinism that I was talking about, sorry for the
> confusion !
oh, that's interesting! are you using strip-nonderminism on all NixOS builds
or only on some and if only on some, how do you opt-in (or -out)?
--
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 11:46:12AM +0100, Pol Dellaiera wrote:
> @Holger: I'm also using Diffoscope with Nix/NixOS when something goes wrong,
> so yeah that useful tool is used outside Debian!
diffoscope is widely used for sure. I was however speaking about
strip-nondeterminism.
--
cheers,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 10:11:47AM +0100, Bernhard M. Wiedemann via rb-general
wrote:
> Now there were only mtimes left in .jar and .zip files that were easily
> normalized with strip-nondeterminism.
nice to see strip-nondeterminism is used outside Debian.
> So today I hold in my hands the firs
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 06:37:55PM +0100, Marcus Hoffmann via rb-general wrote:
> I maintain the weblate insatallation for Codeberg at
> https://translate.codeberg.org which might be another potential option.
> We can (probably) also configure that to work with the gitlab api at salsa,
> which enab
Hi Julien,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 05:16:01PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> I've learned at the rb meeting that the website could be translated.
> Currently, the translation process looks like this: you clone the repo,
> figure that you need to add your language to _config.yml (languages),
> run
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 11:36:32AM +0200, Marcel Fourné wrote:
> Russ Cox posted https://research.swtch.com/nih and disseminates the original
> Ken Thompson compiler backdoor in this, together with a link
> https://research.swtch.com/v6/ to follow along in a simulator.
> More of historical import
hi,
it seems we didnt mail rb-general once more about this fantastic event
taking place in two weeks tomorrow:
https://reproducible-builds.org/events/hamburg2023/
read on for much more info
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 12:24:28AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> Many of you shoul
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:52:26AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> FYI, "this will make the build unreproducible"... :/
fwiw, after reading the replies to this thread (on the debian kernel list,
not here) I don't think this proposal will be implemented...
--
chee
FYI, "this will make the build unreproducible"... :/
- Forwarded message from Bastian Blank -
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2023 15:01:47 +0200
From: Bastian Blank
To: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org, debian-rele...@lists.debian.org,
debian-secur...@lists.debian.org
Hi Roland,
On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 05:37:30PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote:
> here is the 18th update of the status for reproducible live-build ISO images
many thanks for those 18 reports, i'm looking forward to the 19th! :)
> Reproducible status:
> * All major desktops build reproducibly with bul
hi,
I was busy with the Debian Hamburg Reunion 2023 last week and the first
half of this, so I only started catching up on this thread yesterday...
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 10:46:16AM -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> Fair enough. The immediate issue is to reduce confusion.
>
> The OSSGadget devel
hi Vagrant,
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 09:54:58PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I have been poking at gcc and binutils this month; they take a good long
> while to build...
[...]
wheee, kudos & thanks for sharing your progress here!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(de
hi kpcyrd,
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:08:09AM +0200, kpcyrd wrote:
> I was using github actions to compile my project but had trouble matching
> the binary, even when[...]
thanks for sharing your findings here!
[...]
> This can be run without root privileges if user namespaces are enabled. The
>
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 04:41:21PM +0200, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Now that the core-updates development branch has been merged, the
> Full-Source Bootstrap has come to GNU Guix! This means we're building
> packages from source all the way down. Read all about it in this new
> post:
>
>
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 12:40:09PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Yes, ideally SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH does not matter. It is a workaround to
> embed a (hopefully meaningful) timestamp, when from a reproducible
> builds perspective, ideally there would be no timestamp at all in the
> resulting artifac
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds
on the last Tuesday of the month, which is tomorrow in most timezones,
in a bit more than 24h. As usual we meet at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net.
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an hour, as
of course we ai
Dear James,
many thanks also from me for your work on this and sharing your findings here.
I'm another happy sphinx user affected by those problems. :)
somewhat related:
i'm wondering whether distro-info should respect SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:
src:developers-reference builds different content based
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 02:43:43PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > Any progress on that front? What can be done to change things so that the
> > packages people normally *use* are reproducible?
the Debian packages people normally use *are* already reproducible (well, 80-90%
of them, at least),
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds
on the last Tuesday of the month, which is tomorrow in most timezones,
in a bit more than 24h. As usual we meet at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net,
which for many this time is a different localtime than last month!
The meeting is supp
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 11:54:34PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> TTBOMK, the only person with some sticker in Europe at this time is
> Holger, and he should still have a few with him.
no, I gave them all away at FOSDEM and the 'we <3 free software' event of
fsfe...
> Otherwise, it seems to me
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 08:40:46PM -0500, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> Maybe call it "Ways to combine reproducible builds with signatures and other
> metadata"?
"other metadata" brings .buildinfo files^w^wSBOMs to my mind and indeed we
have (at least) two concepts here, including the .buildinfo int
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 12:53:24PM -0500, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> I recommend that the reproducible-builds website have a short article
> *specifically* recommending how signatures, OmniBOR data, & similar metadata
> should be shared.
[...]
> Is there agreement on adding such a page?
Yes, I'd s
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds
on the last Tuesday of the month, which is tomorrow in most timezones,
in a bit less than 19h. As usual we meet at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net.
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an hour, as
of course we a
hi,
On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 12:58:06PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > with 2022 soon coming to an end, I'd like to announce the date and
> > and the location of the next Reproducible Builds Summit in 2023!
> > When: October 30th, November 1st-2nd 2023.
> > What: Three days to continue the growth o
Moin! :)
with 2022 soon coming to an end, I'd like to announce the date and
and the location of the next Reproducible Builds Summit in 2023!
When: October 30th, November 1st-2nd 2023.
What: Three days to continue the grow of the Reproducible Builds effort.
As previously, the exact conten
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:36:46PM +, Simon Butler wrote:
> LGTM - everybody is there. One small issue, the closing parenthesis is
> missing from the link
>
> There are 4 papers referenced in the bibliography that may also be of
> interest.
thanks you for providing merge requests
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 02:14:11AM +0100, FC Stegerman wrote:
> TL;DR: we added 11 new apps using reproducible builds in November,
> making for a total of 31 RB apps in F-Droid as of December 1st [1].
> [1] https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/issues/2844
that's really cool, thank you for sharin
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 02:17:02AM +0100, FC Stegerman wrote:
> I looked at how several android messenger apps claiming to have
> reproducible builds actually verify that they do [1].
> TL;DR: It's quite possible these messengers actually have reproducible
> builds, but the verification scripts the
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 07:47:46PM +, Simon Butler wrote:
> >> I'm pleased to announce that Software Quality Journal have published a
> >> article on reproducible builds. The article is open access and is at
> >> https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11219-022-09607-z
> > wow, a
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 07:36:58AM +, Simon Butler via rb-general wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Software Quality Journal have published a
> article on reproducible builds. The article is open access and is at
> https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11219-022-09607-z
wow
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds
on the last Tuesday of the month, which is tomorrow in most timezones,
in a bit less than 22h. As usual we meet at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net.
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an hour, as
of course we a
hi Vagrant,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 04:28:10PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Since the previous sprints were fun and productive, I am planning on
> doing NMU sprints every Thursday in December (1st, 8th, 15th, 22nd,
> 29th). We are planning on meeting on irc.oftc.net in the
> #debian-reproduci
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds
on the last Tuesday of the month, which is tomorrow in most timezones,
in a bit more than 27h. As usual we meet at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net.
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an hour, as
of course we a
hi,
this is a very late reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds
on the last Tuesday of the month, which is TODAY, in a bit more than 3h.
As usual we meet at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net. I'm sorry for the late reminder
and hope you already had it in your calendar anyway! ;)
The meeti
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 08:55:42AM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> FrOSCon 2022 [0] is coming up and I registered a booth
> for ElectroBSD [1] (and Privoxy [2] and zogftw [3]).
yay!
> I usually also offer project-related materials and am
> thus currently looking for reproducible builds stickers
> an
hi,
this is a very late reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds
on the last Tuesday of the month, which is TODAY, in 4h. As usual we meet at
15 UTC on irc.oftc.net. I'm sorry for the late reminder and hope you already
had it in your calendar anyway! ;)
The meeting is supposed to
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 07:30:28PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I hoped to find some settings on how to prevent that in the weblate's
> project settings. I would have liked something that makes weblate only
> propose merging languages that are… I don't know… probably 75% or more
> translated.
e
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
last Tuesday of the month, which is tomorrow, the 31st of May. As usual
we meet at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net, which is in slightly less than 23h from
now ;)
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an ho
Hi John,
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 01:48:20PM -0700, John Neffenger wrote:
> Starting yesterday, for the first time, the JDK can create reproducible
> builds of the JDK!
[...]
> That also means there's nothing in the JDK that's holding back any Java
> application from having reproducible builds.
[.
Hi Roland,
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 03:53:13PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> [tl;dr faketime results on broken file timestamps for quilt patched
> files on salsa]
which is one of several reasons why (in 2014 or so) we choose not to use
faketime to achieve reproducible-builds.
> Since some tim
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 03:12:56PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
> last Tuesday of the month, which is tomorrow, the 25th of April. As usual
> we meet at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net, which is in slightly less than 24h f
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
last Tuesday of the month, which is tomorrow, the 25th of April. As usual
we meet at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net, which is in slightly less than 24h from
now ;)
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an
Hi Larry,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 09:53:11PM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote:
> In https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/system-images/ there's a paragraph
> about SquashFS metadata & compression. It's superficially OK, but points
> to IMHO an obsolete fork of mksquashfs. No offense to lynxis! He d
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 08:11:57AM +0200, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> > to bring things into perspective, when you say "500 fully reproduced builds
> > of upstream projects releases", out of how many upstream projects in total?
> > 550? 5000? 5? :)
> I don't have the statistics on releases published
ps://reproducible-builds.org/docs/source-date-epoch/
would be helpful.
I'm also sure this is far from perfect, so please improve:
commit 3764949f50fe3d8f557de2b4d26e740f55760c31 (HEAD -> master, origin/master)
Author: Holger Levsen
Date: Wed Mar 30 01:42:39 2022 +0200
explain SOURCE_DATE_E
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
last Tuesday of the month, which is tomorrow, the 29th of March. As usual
we meet at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net, which is in less than 23h from now ;)
(mind the DST changes!)
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, m
Hi Hervé,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 08:27:11AM +0200, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> I just wanted to share how the number of projects that produce reproducible
> releases for the JVM is growing, year after year.
>
> This forced me to rewrite the reporting system, that did not work any more in
> one uniq
Hi Bernhard,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 04:23:06AM +0100, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> I submitted a rb workshop session proposal for
> https://events.opensuse.org/conferences/oSC22
>
> Even if that is not accepted, this conf would be an opportunity for a
> small meetup of rb people.
coolio!
>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:08:39AM +0100, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I live in Vienna, which has lots of good train connections all over Europe,
> but it is more expensive to fly to. I'm happy to help the organizers if its
> in Vienna. Fr example, I can recommend this hotel, which is a funky
hey,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 06:25:04PM -, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Mattia, I could see myself travelling this September for an RB summit.
> Like others have mentioned, I would prefer somewhere Europe for a
> variety of reasons.
same for me. and yay, already looking forward to that! :)
--
cheer
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
last Tuesday of the month, so 22nd of February, at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net,
which is in roughly 62h from now ;)
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an hour, though
we have lots of time (just after
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
last Tuesday of the month, so 25th of January, at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net,
which is in roughly 70h from now.
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an hour, though
we have lots of time (just after 23
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
last Tuesday of the month, so 30th of November, at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net.
This is two days from now. :) Also please note that 15 UTC this month is likely
a different local time than 15 UTC last month...
The meeting i
hi,
this is just a quick reminder that this is today, in 7.5h!
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:32:45PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
> last Tuesday of the month (so 26th of October) at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net.
> Thi
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
last Tuesday of the month (so 26th of October) at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net.
This is five days from now. :)
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an hour, though
we have lots of time (just after 23-42
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:54:19PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:34:03PM -, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Sorry for the slight delay; been under the weather over the weekend. Anyway,
> > please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds
hi,
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:34:03PM -, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Sorry for the slight delay; been under the weather over the weekend. Anyway,
> please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report:
> https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-09/?draft
jenkins is also not doing
On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 09:38:50PM +, jerem...@pdp10.guru wrote:
> Thanks to the incredible efforts of Andrius Štikonas over the last 4
> months, today we announce the release of version 1.4 of stage0-posix.
[...]
> As always all supported architectures are able to cross-verify all other
> ar
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
last Tuesday of the month (so 28th of September) at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net.
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an hour, though
we have lots of time (just after 23-42m on one topic we move on any
hi,
FYI: from Sep 26 til Oct 1 there will be a small Debian hackmeeting
taking place in Hamburg, Germany, where we would be delighted to
welcome people working on Reproducible Builds in general! (IOW: this
not limited to Debian)
If you are located somewhat nearby, please check out
https://wiki.de
Hi Janneke,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 12:41:49PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> I'm thinking about the binary seed that's used to produce a new release,
> as far as I understand it, Debian's binary seed is "build-essential".
>
> I imagine that for a new Debian binary release, e.g., Bullseye, fir
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 09:18:16AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> [...] It would be amazing to get
> a GNU Mes based reduced binary seed bootstrap into Debian.
what does or would that mean? Debian is a binary distribution and sadly
Debian is only bootstrapped once per port. (Not trying to dis
hi,
this is a reminder for our next IRC meeting on #reproducible-builds on the
last Tuesday of the month (so 31st of August) at 15 UTC on irc.oftc.net.
The meeting is supposed to last between 1-2h, maybe rather an hour, though
we have lots of time (just after 23-42m on one topic we move on anyway
lseye & Bookworm - where we come from and where we are
going
Speaker: Holger Levsen
Language: English
Track: Introduction to Free Software & Debian
Type: Long talk (45 minutes)
Room: Talks 1
Time: Aug 24 (Tue): 19:00 UTC
Duration: 0:45
In this talk Holger Levsen will give an update on Reproduci
hi kpcyrd,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:16:29PM +, kpcyrd wrote:
> I uploaded a github repo that distributes a Hello World in various
> formats (ELF binary, Docker image, 3rd party(!) Arch Linux package) and
> documented every file and command needed to reproduce the artifacts
> bit-for-bit:
>
Hi Richard,
thanks for your feedback!
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:46:27PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> For yocto, we can generate packages and we do run tests of our default config
> on those:
>
> https://www.yoctoproject.org/reproducible-build-results/
>
> so 36 exclusions (known issues, eff
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 08:53:48PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> And then, those lists are formatted incorrectly on
> https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/history/
> and I fail to find a fix right this. This affects not only the list of
> contributors but also lists, like the
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 01:21:48PM +, Chris Lamb (@lamby) wrote:
> Chris Lamb pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds /
> reproducible-website
>
>
> Commits:
> 1b5838fe by Chris Lamb at 2021-07-31T14:21:01+01:00
> Migrate 'history' from the Debian wiki.
yay, thank you Chris for
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 02:51:17PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> There is definitely an argument to be as complete as possible, but I
> think the best thing from the perspective of the ecosystem map is to
> be as consistent as possible across similar entities.
I'm not sure there is so much consistanc
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 11:07:21AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this so far. I've spent a little
> time this morning tidying up, merging and elaborating all of your
> input — it is looking a lot more useful and complete now.
>
> However, can everyone have anothe
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
