On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 21:53 -0700, PATRICK MOORE wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com
wrote:
But if the
target audience is predisposed toward carrying little, and
that only in
a small seat
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 21:49 -0700, PATRICK MOORE wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:59 PM, james black chocot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On the other other hand, I think low-trail geometry is more
than a
trendy bandwagon, and is in fact actually
On Dec 31, 2009, at 7:27 AM, Steve Palincsar wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 21:49 -0700, PATRICK MOORE wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:59 PM, james black chocot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On the other other hand, I think low-trail geometry is more
than a
trendy
But you said, or seemed to say, or did not take the extreme care needed not
to appear to say, or could reasonably be interpreted as saying, that high
trail is good only for no front/low rear loading. I take it that, despite
appearances, or interpretations, or sundry ambiguities and biases, you did
huh?
In a message dated 12/31/2009 10:43:28 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
bertin...@gmail.com writes:
But you said, or seemed to say, or did not take the extreme care needed
not to appear to say, or could reasonably be interpreted as saying, that high
trail is good only for no front/low
Perfectly clear, obviously, although I meant it for SP and forgot and
clicked everyone.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 8:47 AM, bpus...@aol.com wrote:
huh?
In a message dated 12/31/2009 10:43:28 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
bertin...@gmail.com writes:
But you said, or seemed to say, or did not
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com wrote:
High trail bikes tend to lock in on a line through corners. This is
good in that minor bumps and pavement irregularities won't throw the
bike off course: it corners like it's on rails. However, if you find
halfway
Can't we work in a discussion of how wearing a helmet affects handling in high
or low trail bikes? You know, start multi-tasking these crucial issues? Oh, and
be sure to include a bar bag, and refer to a Roadeo to stay on topic...
Tim McNamara wrote:
Steve
On Dec 31, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Bruce wrote:
It seems that after riding a few minutes, I am used to whichever
trail the bike I am on has.
I find this, too. Ditto the small differences in position my various
bikes have. By the time I'm a block from my house, I've adjusted.
--
You
No, but if you can hit a second audience by simply offering another fork, why
not? Randonneuring is growing, and Francophilia is in vogue. The tubing spec
and other aspects of the frame would make a good fastish Brevet bike.
Seems like low-hanging fruit to me.
On 12/30/09 2:48 PM,
Wouldn't the concept of a low trail additional fork option work for
all Rivendell models?
Or is the low trail also coupled with other geometry changes needed to
fully express itself in a great handling bike? By that I mean that the
current great handling shouldn't suffer at all after swapping
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 15:43, Dustin N. Sharp dsh...@runbox.com wrote:
No, but if you can hit a second audience by simply offering another fork, why
not? Randonneuring is growing, and Francophilia is in vogue. The tubing spec
and other aspects of the frame would make a good fastish Brevet
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 15:59 -0800, james black wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 15:43, Dustin N. Sharp dsh...@runbox.com wrote:
No, but if you can hit a second audience by simply offering another fork,
why not? Randonneuring is growing, and Francophilia is in vogue. The
tubing spec and
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:59 PM, james black chocot...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other other hand, I think low-trail geometry is more than a
trendy bandwagon, and is in fact actually superior.
Why is this, exactly? I know it is better for front loads, but apart from
front loads, are there
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com wrote:
But if the
target audience is predisposed toward carrying little, and that only in
a small seat pack and their jersey pockets, a low trail configuration
that demands a handlebar bag with some weight in it to feel right
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 20:49, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is this, exactly? I know it is better for front loads, but apart from
front loads, are there advantages? I ask because all three Rivs I have owned
have handled impeccably; I can't think of any improvement to them.
It's
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 20:53, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
So why would low trail be better for me with my rear
loads up to 40 lb?
Steve didn't say it would be. There seems to be widespread agreement
that high trail is better for rear-biased loads, and low trail better
for
17 matches
Mail list logo
