I am in roughly the same boat. Sure is a pretty bike tho...too many
nice bikes out there, too few dollars here!
Steve, East Lansing, MI
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Joe Bernard joerem...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course the saddle height works perfect for me. But it's not gonna happen.
I need
Oh this is great. I have a PBH of 88.9. Is this frame too small for me?
On Monday, December 10, 2012 12:24:01 PM UTC-8, Mojo wrote:
Real looker for sure. The specs say mountain bike, to me rather
than all'rounder, or at least B-stone XO-inspired. I'd love to add
it to my fleet and it would fit me but there are currently other
demands on my limited discretionary funds.
Steve, EL, MI.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Michael
It has a long toptube in relation to the seattube - MTB low-standover style
- so you need to judge based on the toptube. At my 80ish PBH the frame is
technically within range, but certainly not with that stem and dropbars. As
currently set up, it may fit you.
Joe Bernard
On Wednesday,
The bike is currently set up for a saddle height of 70.6 cm. Yes, I asked
because (darn it!) it looks to be my size.
A PBH of 88.9 cm should have a saddle height of closer to 80 cm, maybe 78
or 79cm. That's an extra 3 of seatpost, which means you'll need to raise
the handlebar a similar amount
dis may help:
http://www.rivbike.com/kb_results.asp?ID=41
scroll down for chart...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Ah damn, just as well...
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 12, 2012, at 6:38 PM, Benz, Sunnyvale, CA benzouy...@gmail.com wrote:
The bike is currently set up for a saddle height of 70.6 cm. Yes, I asked
because (darn it!) it looks to be my size.
A PBH of 88.9 cm should have a saddle height of
Of course the saddle height works perfect for me. But it's not gonna
happen. I need a triple drivetrain for trails *and *the hills around my
house, and the dropbars would be ditched for a Bullmoose I already have.
I'd need to score it as a frameset the way he did, which is the only way I
could
Hunqa seems a bit more overbuilt for offroad adventure touring from reading
the description. My AR is sturdy and all though:
http://reno-rambler.blogspot.com/search?q=monster+cross
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Mike Schiller mikeybi...@rocketmail.comwrote:
sorta looks like an ancestor
I happened accross some additional pictures of this bike recently,
when the current owner bought it and posted about it here:
http://forums.thepaceline.net/showthread.php?t=108969
That's one of the prettiest bikes I've ever seen, but I'm going to go
out on a limb and say that it's probably a
Oh mama... that IS a looker... and personally I think someone is going to
steal that at $2500...
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 10:21:12 AM UTC-5, iamkeith wrote:
I happened accross some additional pictures of this bike recently,
when the current owner bought it and posted about it here:
FWIW, I've bought from the seller before (a Joe Strack built/Joe Bell
painted Rivendell single speed with track ends) and he's a pleasure to
deal with. If you're interested in the bike, I can help put interested
parties in contact with the seller. I suspect he's willing to negotiate a
sell
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Steve yngp...@yahoo.com wrote:
FWIW, I've bought from the seller before (a Joe Strack built/Joe Bell
painted Rivendell single speed with track ends)
Pictures, please! What year was that built?
jim m
wc ca
--
You received this message because you are
Pictures from the seller here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wilkinson411/sets/72157623886409272/
Now set up with Jitensha bars. My understanding was that is was built in
1997
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:18:03 PM UTC-5, Jim M. wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Steve
The 48 for the seat tube is center to center. A center to top would most
likely be about 51 or so. Jim D.Massachusetts
On Monday, December 10, 2012 4:18:36 PM UTC-5, Joe Bernard wrote:
It has the fancy paint option, and is sized oddly, too. 48st/55tt was not
a common A/R spec back
that guy has some nice bikes! Some serious cash in his garage.
~mike
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 12:36:44 PM UTC-8, Steve wrote:
Pictures from the seller here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wilkinson411/sets/72157623886409272/
Now set up with Jitensha bars. My understanding was that
It has the fancy paint option, and is sized oddly, too. 48st/55tt was not a
common A/R spec back then. I suspect it's a Joe Starck build. It's my size
and s pretty...
Joe Bernard
Vallejo, CA.
On Monday, December 10, 2012 12:24:01 PM UTC-8, Mojo wrote:
Wow! That is pretty.
I have seen these on the grainy pics of the RReaders, but never in color.
Very nice looking bike.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
There's a Flickr group with some color pix of All Rounders.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/allrounder/
-Norman in PDX
From: Michael john11.2...@gmail.com
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 2:21 PM
Subject: [RBW] Re: All
sorta looks like an ancestor to the Hunqapillar I think. Wish it were a
larger size but then I'd have to deal with those bike buy-or-not demons.
~mike
Carlsbad Ca
On Monday, December 10, 2012 12:24:01 PM UTC-8, Mojo wrote:
20 matches
Mail list logo
