[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-02 Thread Philip Williamson
Earlier this year the minimum was SEVEN! What happened? And even though I would be happy with one bike... I do have three. I would love a Fargo. And a Roadeo. And before that, I wanted a Pugsley. And before that, a Kogswell Porteur. But I just keep riding my Quickbeam, and my mountain bike, and my

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread Pondero
Enough, as I imagined it, would be sufficient for a given person. In other words, might it possible that someone might have a sufficiently narrow use range, so that one versatile bike could satisfy? Yeah, you're right, probably not. Not if that someone really likes bicycles. On Aug 31, 8:26 

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread William
OK, I'll play: one bike can't do it all - I've tried. define can't. With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3 handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do. In order to say that it can't, I think

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread JoelMatthews
define can't. With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3 handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do. In order to say that it can't, I think you'd have to bring in qualitative stuff like my

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread Michael_S
I've considered this subject a few times recently. I am hoping to semi- retire next year and relocate to smaller place near the ocean, perhaps with only a one car garage. what bike or what few bikes would I choose to do the riding Ilike to do. I would want a lightweight fast road bike with 28mm

Re: [RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread PATRICK MOORE
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:43 AM, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote: OK, I'll play: one bike can't do it all - I've tried. define can't. Well parried. I mean, in my own case, I *do* want at least one, light, fast as possible road bike with all the qualities of top road bike handling -- and

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread William
Well parried. I'm glad you took as intended, just playing with words. I'm totally on board with the notion that there is a broad range of ride qualities that no one bike can provide, and I think you are spot on with tubing dimensions. I think what you'd need is a bike with a couple dials on the

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread doug peterson
Another side of the question is whether or not you demand the the ultimate in performance for various types of riding. If you intend to go on the weekly racers training ride on Thurs and rock hopping on Saturday, you need a couple of very different bicycles. OTH, if you like friendly pavement

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread Philip Williamson
I'm with Joel on the competitive riding. Sometimes I feel like I should care, but I just don't. I kind of wish I'd been the one to call Alberto Contador that tri guy. I have three bikes, and would be happy with just the Quickbeam. If it was my only bike, I wouldn't switch out the cockpit, since

Re: [RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread Bill Connell
I'm down to a nearly all-time low of 3 bikes. What i've figured out with the single bike notion is that, for me, the goal of having one bike isn't worth the hassle of changing that bike for different uses. I do switch my 'cross bike from commuter to racer and back once a year, but i get tired of

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread EricP
Well, I'm at 4 (or 3 1/2 since one is a folder). And to be quite honest, three are somewhat overlapping. Yes, I could maybe, possibly, get by with one bike (my Sam Hillborne). But then I'd feel guilty riding it through the slush/ice/snow of winter knowing the frame will probably rot in about 5

Re: [RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread PATRICK MOORE
The Powers that Be have just cut the statutory minimum number of bicycles from five to four: gofast; gofast commuter (just first gofast but with fenders, lights, rack); beater that is as close to the second gofast as possible but much cheaper so that you actually enjoy riding it to Costco or

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-08-31 Thread Pondero
...but can one bike do enough? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-08-31 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Define enough. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote: ...but can one bike do enough? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-08-31 Thread Montclair BobbyB
Patrick: Seeing how Rene S had his Bombadil set up (with such a wide variety of configurations) is what ultimately drew me to this bike. When I get my hands on it, I'm going to try setting it up with 2 basic configurations: as roadish as I can, and as beastly (ie fat-tired monster bike) as I

[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-08-31 Thread RJM
Nice bike. I have pondered which first riv to get and the Bombadil makes the top two everytime. I know exactly the setup I want for it if I choose the Bomba, just don't know if it will beat out the Atlantis that I have built in my head as my first Riv. On Aug 31, 6:56 pm, Kip Otteson