The BLUG today documents a method to get slightly
more cable pull out of a Silver shifter.
BL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Thicker wall thickness means a smaller hole. All steel seat tubes are 28.6mm
outside diameter. Frames thy take a 27.2mm seat post have 0.7mm wall thickness.
Frames that take a 26.8mm seatpost have a 0.9mm wall thickness. For a stout,
reliable bike like an Atlantis which should last for 50
Interesting. I'll give them a call tomorrow. What's behind a move to 28.6?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Also—sweet bike!
Bob
Brooklyn, NY
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group,
I can confirm what Bill said. Same thing happened to me when I got my hunq in
2016. It needs a 26.8. I wish Riv’s geometry chart had that!
Bob
Brooklyn, NY
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
I think it's 26.8mm nowadays.
On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 6:53:22 PM UTC-8, drew wrote:
>
> I got my long awaited 650b hunq-green Atlantis frame today. Its real
> pretty and has some nice little details that I wasn't expecting. I'm
> building it up with parts from the hunqapillar I
I was fine with no foot retention and flat pedals when trying fixed early on...
until I hit a steep hill with my “too low for the road 63” gear” and decided to
try and see how well I could just “coast”... relax the legs and spin like the
wind. It wasn’t long before I couldn’t keep up and feet
Drew,
I had a Hunq that turned out to take a 27. Call Rivendell, when I talked to
Will he said some of the frames were reamed to 27, and he sent me a post right
away.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from
I just found out the hard way that a Hub Area Rack mounted on a disc fork
does not fully clear the disc caliper (at least not the Paul Klampers which
are extrmely wide). With a couple washers it mounts OK but the
caliper still interferes with the little mounting pocket on the back of the
while i am no expert I have given fixed riding a go and found that with brakes
riding fixed with no foot retention is fine. Fixed sans brakes and foot
retention is no bueno!
best,
Richard
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
Here it is. Send him a PM.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/rbw-owners-bunch/tony$20xo-2$20fork%7Csort:date/rbw-owners-bunch/XzUkZ8LS6sM/-f-NvmvBBAAJ
On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 6:28:43 PM UTC-7, iamkeith wrote:
>
> Seems like there was somebody else recently, on this list
Seems like there was somebody else recently, on this list or the ibob list,
looking for a fork with more clearance and enough steerer tube for a 59cm
XO-2. Tony, perhaps? Maybe somebody else will remember, or I can find the
thread.
On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 8:44:38 AM UTC-7, Conway
Ha! Sounds like we’re in violent agreement. Grin.
With abandon,
Patrick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
“… even if this reason doesn’t apply to every rider.”
So true. So very true.
--Eric Norris
campyonly...@me.com
@CampyOnlyguy (Twitter/Instagram)
> On Dec 12, 2017, at 4:00 PM, Patrick Moore wrote:
>
> There are reasons for this, even if this reason doesn't apply to every
I can generate a lot of additional power by pulling back and up; and in
those instances were I've pulled my foot out of shoe, or shoe out of pedal
retention, I've more than a few times come close to falling over. I very
definitely feel and use the additional torque generated in this way.
But even
On 12/12/2017 06:48 PM, Deacon Patrick wrote:
You are right, Steve, in the event of a foot coming off a pedal, legs would
need to splay outward
and quickly, too
and front brake engaged until pedals slowed down enough to safely (without
maiming). I actually practiced this (and other ways
You are right, Steve, in the event of a foot coming off a pedal, legs would
need to splay outward and front brake engaged until pedals slowed down enough
to safely (without maiming). I actually practiced this (and other ways to screw
up safely) early on, though not since. Not fun, not painful,
Lee, yes. Our eating table is 16” high or so. I just sit on thin cusions on a
tile floor. My desk is a kneeling desk, roughly the same height.
Eric, I understand. But it sure seems overstated that pedal retention is
required to ride safely or well. As a rider preferance, makes perfect sense
On 12/12/2017 06:16 PM, Deacon Patrick wrote:
Ha, Chris! Conventional wisdom is an oxymoron. Which is either a moron on
oxygen or oxycodon. Grin. I can’t see a reason why pedal retention is required
to make fixed safe.
Well, consider for a second the situation if your foot /does/ slip off
One other plus for tight retention is climbing steep hills. I stopped using
cleatless shoes when I found myself routinely pulingl my feet out of
semi-tight straps (or pulling my feet out of shoes tightened into the
straps) when torquing hard -- pulling back and up -- on very steep hills at
very
Deacon:
For some people (myself included), it’s safer to have one’s feet attached to
the pedals when going fast and “coasting” on a fixed gear. When the pedals
start going very, very fast, I would rather not lose contact with the pedals,
because it’s quite hard to reconnect when the pedals are
Hi Deacon,
I have a question to the last part. Do you eat off a low table since you
are floor living?
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Deacon Patrick wrote:
> Ha, Chris! Conventional wisdom is an oxymoron. Which is either a moron on
> oxygen or oxycodon. Grin. I can’t see
There was one in Reader #44. Here's a pic:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4cmkuqpss259bga/File%20Dec%2012%2C%205%2015%2032%20PM.jpeg?dl=0
Mike
On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 4:15:57 PM UTC-6, RDS wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a link or screenshot to the info where it showed the
> suggested max
Ha, Chris! Conventional wisdom is an oxymoron. Which is either a moron on
oxygen or oxycodon. Grin. I can’t see a reason why pedal retention is required
to make fixed safe. I can see why people who like it on freewheeled bikes like
it on fixed bikes. My feet haven’t come off the pedals unbidden
I don't recall Rivendell ever posting a max rider weight vs Riv model. I
do recall them posting a list of tire widths for rider weight. Tire width
certainly implies bike model. Like if you are 350 pounds and if Riv thinks
a 350 pounder should be running 60mm tires on the road, then you
I only use flat pedals fixed, and have for years. I haven't encountered a
downside yet. I had straps, then clipless, then I made pedal decks that
snapped into the clipless, and then I went to BMX pedals. Each iteration
was an improvement. My Ross just has old mtb caged pedals, and also works
I can't answer most of your questions but I did purchase a 52 cm Sam before
the size change. If I recall correctly it was 52, then 56.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Does anyone have a link or screenshot to the info where it showed the
suggested max rider weight per Rivendell model? I can't remember where I
originally saw the info .. may have been a rivendell reader.
I sometimes see people list Sam's for sale in size 56. What was the next
size down
Hey Riv-folk,
Hoping to convert my excess touring gear into cash for other cycling
goodies. What iBOB wouldn't want to wake up to Ortlieb under the tree on
Christmas morning? Also the perfect Christmas gift for your spouse (if you
like sleeping on the couch)! ;)
I'll try to do actual
Sold.
On Friday, December 8, 2017 at 5:23:46 PM UTC-8, J Imler wrote:
>
> Sale pending.
>
> On Friday, December 8, 2017 at 2:15:42 PM UTC-8, J Imler wrote:
>>
>> No I didn't realize that. Mainly going off the bag's condition. I must
>> say the leather on this guy is legit.
>> Price drop $200
As a fellow vertigo sufferer (although not nearly as bad!) I can identify
with the preference to a direct connection with your bike, the earth, etc.
I have noticed that the more direct feedback of a rigid or hardtail
mountain bike is preferable for me, as compared to a motorcycle or even a
Good job! Your load rivals what I can carry on my Xtracycle on a normal
grocery run, Very Impressive!
For an extreme approach, below shows my Xtracycle four years ago when I
tried to really push it weight-wise: Two 28 lb boxes of kitty litter, 8
gallons of distilled water, two big bags of
Ted's hypothesis seems to fit with experience, in that it would account for
the "pedaling in squares" symptom when going back to a fw or S3X hubbed
bike after riding real fixed for a while; that is, you have to "regain" the
mental-cum-physiological habit of "keeping your feet ahead of drivetrain
Interestingly, I also started out fixed with about a 63" high gear
(40x17/19 dingle with 170 cranks and 700x32) and also quickly ramped up to
70" by increasing chainrings to 42t, then 44t. I'm in central NJ and 63"
feels great in my local park (expansive network of flattish trails right
Sold.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
House cleaning, bike purchase and relationship maintenance requires me to sell
this fork. It was from a grey bean Hunqapillar and I had comrade cycles in
Chicago drop the canti posts to briefly run really fat 26" wheels on a '93
XO-2. I never repainted the area where the work was done but it
I bought a Hunqapillar and need to be proactive about freeing up space so for
sale is my most ridden bike, a 56 cm double tt Samuel Hillborne frameset WITH
Paul Components center pull brakes.
I bought this new from Riv in August of 2013. It was a web special with the
non cream headtube
I should amend my prior comments to add that my cloth tape preference is
not due to any increased cushion vs. leather but a textural and
convenience preference (cloth is just more forgiving and easier to wrap)...
I've often doubled up the cotton cloth tape to increase cushion and
thickness but
The perforations should allow the tape to breathe and dry out after a ride,
meaning LESS moisture buildup, if anything. I always thought that was the
reason for the perforations in the first place.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners
I've sweat-soaked my Brooks perforated leather tape several times on
RAGBRAI. It's holding up pretty well.
What corrosion are you worried about? Aluminum doesn't corrode
significantly without galvanic contact with another metal (like steel).
I did not like the feel nor the stiffness of cloth
i used the brooks tape and it hasn't been a problem.
though the cotton with the shellac is not a bad idea to give some cushion,
the brooks leather bar tape is pretty firm and stiff until it breaks in.
On Monday, December 11, 2017 at 10:06:33 PM UTC-5, ted wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I've got a best
As someone who sweats heavily and has come to prefer cloth bar tape I don’t
think perforated leather would be any more of an issue than highly absorbent
cotton cloth and I’ve never had an issue although my mileage has been limited
and bar wraps short lived anyway with lots of recent bar
Interesting, Philip. I feel connected with the ground, through the bike. But
I’m highly sensitive, rather like a canary in a coal mine. Lots of examples,
but I’ll focus on chairs, for example. Science is discovering they are poor for
circulation and thus heart health. I suspect they are poor
Hi Ted,
I wear gloves when riding, so don't have the sweat issue you described but
I also don't see the holes getting gunked up with dirt of any other type.
But the few times I've ridden short distances I've found Brooks leather
tape to be kinda slick, not as grippy as it feels with gloves.
44 matches
Mail list logo