Re: [RBW] Re: Losco vs Albatross 6mm Additional Sweep back--an additional 6cm

2021-06-09 Thread 'Je Mar' via RBW Owners Bunch
Jason, I forgot you were in Canada (I thought you were in Portland for some reason), but all good. thx Jeff On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 2:55:24 PM UTC-4 Jason Fuller wrote: > 100% would be keen on that except the Canada-US border might make it > shipping-prohibitive. I can get a quote in a

[RBW] Re: Losco vs Albatross 6mm Additional Sweep back--an additional 6cm

2021-05-10 Thread Jason Fuller
I love the look of the Losco, but it's currently homeless in my collection simply due to none of my bikes being long enough for it! Comfy when cruising, but as soon as I need to climb a hill or pedal harder, I am awkwardly trying to hold the front corners. The bar I can't get out of my mind

[RBW] Re: Losco vs Albatross 6mm Additional Sweep back--an additional 6cm

2021-05-09 Thread Pancake
Not exactly the same, but you can compare the Albatross and the Bosco at https://whatbars.com/ and get a similar result (shows nearer a 7cm length of further extension, but according to Pythagorus, that’s about 6cm of additional sweepback. Curious if anyone has compared the Tosco bars to

[RBW] Re: Losco vs Albatross 6mm Additional Sweep back--an additional 6cm

2021-05-08 Thread 'Joel S' via RBW Owners Bunch
With a long stem it would be fine but for me I think it would bring the end to near me. I don’t hold the bars at the ends and find the Choco gives me added stretch over the Albatross, but this would be for a different usage. They are raised up enough for good clearance I would think.