2017-07-31 13:26 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel :
> The _type_ is in Rcpp proper, so maybe RcppXPtrHelpers, or RcppXPtrWrappers,
> or just RcppXPtrUtils?
Here we go, comments and PRs welcome: https://github.com/Enchufa2/RcppXPtrUtils
Apart from adding tests, I was thinking about defining a wrapper f
On 31 July 2017 at 10:57, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
| Ok then, I'll sketch out a new package. May I use the name "RcppXPtr"?
Sure, could do.
The _type_ is in Rcpp proper, so maybe RcppXPtrHelpers, or RcppXPtrWrappers,
or just RcppXPtrUtils?
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...
2017-07-31 1:29 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel :
>
> This might be most suitable for an add-on package, at least until all bugs
> are ironed out. The use case and scope is more limited than for
> cppFunction().
Agree. In fact, I can prepend the getter's declaration and append the
definition, so tha
