Message-
> From: rcpp-devel-boun...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
> [mailto:rcpp-devel-boun...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at] On Behalf Of Romain Francois
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 7:42 AM
> To: Dirk Eddelbuettel
> Cc: rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
> Subject: Re: [Rcpp-dev
pp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] Armor, Shield and Shelter.
Le 11/10/13 13:26, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
>
> Romain,
>
> On 11 October 2013 at 13:03, Romain Francois wrote:
> | Anyway, I'd like to propose adding Shield, Armor and Shleter to Rcpp.
&
Le 11/10/13 13:26, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
Romain,
On 11 October 2013 at 13:03, Romain Francois wrote:
| Anyway, I'd like to propose adding Shield, Armor and Shleter to Rcpp.
Sure.
| This is a non disruptive proposal as the template classes I propose
| don't interract with the rest of the
Romain,
On 11 October 2013 at 13:03, Romain Francois wrote:
| Anyway, I'd like to propose adding Shield, Armor and Shleter to Rcpp.
Sure.
| This is a non disruptive proposal as the template classes I propose
| don't interract with the rest of the code. We might not use them in
| Rcpp, but we
Hello,
As usual when I work on some packge that use Rcpp, I come up with ideas.
On dplyrRcpp I've defined these classes to handle stack based protection
of objects from the GC. These are thin wrappers around PROTECT /
UNPROTECT / PROTECT_WITH_INDEX
Sometimes, the Rcpp api classes don't quite
