On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 20:33, Kevin Ushey wrote:
>
> I think this might be worth fixing on the Rcpp side -- there should
> really only be one instance of the Rcout object. Would you mind filing
> an issue at https://github.com/RcppCore/Rcpp/issues, so we don't lose
> track of this?
Sure, no proble
I think this might be worth fixing on the Rcpp side -- there should
really only be one instance of the Rcout object. Would you mind filing
an issue at https://github.com/RcppCore/Rcpp/issues, so we don't lose
track of this?
You could of course just create your own Rcout / Rcerr objects as well
(th
